Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
21 07 78 • KG LU 21 07 78 Generato dall'IA

Jurisdiction for Revocation of Conditional Release Under New Penal Code

Numero d'incarto 21 07 78
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual conditionally released in December 2004 was subsequently convicted in April 2007 for offenses committed partly during the probation period, leading the correctional services to inquire which authority had jurisdiction to decide on a potential revocation of the conditional release under the newly enacted penal code provisions. The court reasoned that since the new law's provisions regarding the regime of execution of sentences apply even to those convicted under the old law, and drawing an analogy from jurisprudence regarding conditional release (Art. 86 StGB), the court that judged the new offenses (the Appellate Court) retains jurisdiction under the new law (Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB) to decide on any subsequent revocation of the earlier conditional release.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB, Art. 63 StGB, Art. 38 Ziff. 4 Abs. 1 aStGB, Art. 388 Abs. 3 StGB, Art. 89 StGB, Art. 86 StGB; Jurisdiction for Revocation of Conditional Release Under New Penal Code: The court reasoned that since the new law's provisions regarding the regime of execution of sentences apply even to those convicted under the old law, and drawing an analogy from jurisprudence regarding conditional release (Art. 86 StGB), the court that judged the new offenses (the Appellate Court) retains jurisdiction under the new law (Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB) to decide on any subsequent revocation of the earlier conditional release.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della liberazione condizionale commisurazione della pena codice di procedura penale consegna di carcerati pene condizionali esonero dall'obbligo di lavorare

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB
This article determines the competent authority (Obergericht) for deciding on the recommitment to prison following new criminal activity.
Art. 63 StGB
Art. 38 Ziff. 4 Abs. 1 aStGB
Art. 388 Abs. 3 StGB
Art. 89 StGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 89 Abs.
Art. 86 StGB

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 133 IV 201
Conditional Early Release and Application of New Drug Sentencing Laws
Generato dall'IA
V 98 157
Discretionary Revocation of Conditional Release Lacking Prognosis and Consideration of Positive Post-Offense Changes
4N 21 2
Interpretation of Penal Code Article 63b Para 4 Sentence 2 Regarding Conditional Sentence Execution After Outpatient Measures
4H 19 44
Military, Civil Protection, and Penitentiary Service Authority for Conditional Release Decisions
21 06 190
Retroactive Application of Milder Criminal Code Provisions in Sentencing
21 97 176
Deferred Sentence Conditional Suspension Limits

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB

This article determines the competent authority (Obergericht) for deciding on the recommitment to prison following new criminal activity.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 26.07.2007

Fallnummer: · 21 07 78

LGVE: · 2007 I Nr. 46

Leitsatz: · Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB. Sachliche Zuständigkeit für die Rückversetzung in den Strafvollzug nach erneuter Straffälligkeit.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.