Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
21 06 100 4 • KG LU 21 06 100 4 Generato dall'IA

State v. [Perpetrator Name]: Review of Aggravated Rape Sentence and Mandatory Psychotherapy Order

Numero d'incarto 21 06 100 4
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a review proceeding concerning a man convicted of raping a four-year-old girl and severely injuring her grandmother, the High Court upheld the lower court's finding of guilt and sentence of seven years imprisonment for aggravated rape and other offenses. Based on two psychiatric evaluations indicating a need for specialized treatment due to a strong likelihood of future offenses stemming from a severe antisocial personality disorder, the court ordered the perpetrator to undergo mandatory inpatient psychotherapy in a specialized, locked facility under the revised criminal law, while confirming the original prison sentence and offsetting time served.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Im Neubeurteilungsverfahren gegen den Mann, der im Jahr 2002 in Luzern ein vierjähriges Mädchen vergewaltigte und dessen Grossmutter schwer verletzte, bestätigte das Obergericht den Schuldbefund und die Strafe der Vorinstanz. Wie schon das Kriminalgericht sprach das Obergericht den Täter nebst anderen Delikten der grausamen Vergewaltigung schuldig und verurteilte ihn zu einer siebenjährigen Freiheitsstrafe. Überdies ordnete es gestützt auf zwei psychiatrische Gutachten eine stationäre psychotherapeutische Behandlung des Täters in einer spezialisierten, geschlossenen Einrichtung (nach revidiertem Strafrecht) an. | Strafrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violenza carnale sentenza penale cura psichiatrica lesioni semplici qualificate trauma psicologico controllo della detenzione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 190 Abs. 3 StGB
The court confirmed the conviction for rape under the aggravated form (Art. 190 Abs. 3 StGB).
Art. 122 Abs. 3 StGB
The court confirmed the conviction for multiple counts of aggravated bodily harm.
Art. 139 Ziff. 1 StGB
The court confirmed the conviction for multiple counts of theft.
Art. 140 Ziff. 1 Abs. 1 StGB
The court confirmed the conviction for multiple counts of robbery.
Art. 144 Abs. 1 StGB
The court confirmed the conviction for multiple counts of property damage.
Art. 156 Ziff. 3 StGB
The court confirmed the conviction for extortion by robbery.
Art. 183 Ziff. 1 StGB
The court confirmed the conviction for unlawful deprivation of liberty.
Art. 186 StGB
The court confirmed the conviction for multiple counts of trespassing.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
6P.102/2005
Complainants v. Convicted Individual (Improper Judicial Composition)
6S.326/2005
BGE 120 IV 194
Sexual Acts with Children and Defilement: Ideal Concurrence
BGE 119 IV 49
Federal Supreme Court Upholds Rape Conviction Based on Cruel Strangulation Tactics
BGE 124 IV 154
Supreme Court: Real Concurrence Applies to Child Sexual Abuse, Sexual Coercion, and Rape Under Specific Circumstances
BGE 117 IV 112
Swiss Federal Supreme Court Remands Sentence and Expulsion for Insufficient Justification
Generato dall'IA
21 06 100 2
Aggravated Rape Based on Cruelty in Child Sexual Assault
4M 13 30
Sexual Offense Sentence Upheld with Mandatory Psychotherapy Probation Condition
RRE Nr 1473
Sexual Assault Survivor Appeal Regarding Mandatory Psychotherapy Evaluation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 190 Abs. 3 StGB

The court confirmed the conviction for rape under the aggravated form (Art. 190 Abs. 3 StGB).

Art. 187 Ziff. 1 StGB

The court confirmed the conviction for sexual acts with children.

Art. 122 Abs. 3 StGB

The court confirmed the conviction for multiple counts of aggravated bodily harm.

Art. 139 Ziff. 1 StGB

The court confirmed the conviction for multiple counts of theft.

Art. 21 Abs. 1 aStGB

The court confirmed the conviction for attempted theft.

Art. 140 Ziff. 1 Abs. 1 StGB

The court confirmed the conviction for multiple counts of robbery.

Art. 144 Abs. 1 StGB

The court confirmed the conviction for multiple counts of property damage.

Art. 156 Ziff. 3 StGB

The court confirmed the conviction for extortion by robbery.

Art. 183 Ziff. 1 StGB

The court confirmed the conviction for unlawful deprivation of liberty.

Art. 186 StGB

The court confirmed the conviction for multiple counts of trespassing.

Art. 64 Abs. 9 aStGB

This provision regarding reduced capacity due to non-completion of the 20th year was cited in the context of sentencing.

Art. 59 Abs. 3 StGB

The court ordered a stationary psychotherapeutic treatment in a specialized, closed facility.

Art. 43 Ziff. 1 Abs. 1 StGB

This article was mentioned in the initial disposal (order 4 of the May 2005 decision) regarding the previous order for outpatient treatment, but the final order 3 replaces it with Art. 59 Abs. 3 StGB.

Art. 58 StGB

The court ordered the confiscation of the SIM card, although it was modified in the final order 6 to remain with the file.

Art. 285h Abs. 3 StPO

This procedural rule was cited in the reasoning for calculating the fee payment to the defense lawyer R. in the costs section (Order 8).

Art. 285h Abs. 2 lit. d StPO

This procedural rule was cited in the reasoning for calculating the fee payment to the defense lawyer R. in the costs section (Order 8).

Art. 95 ff. BGG

Cited in the reasons section (Order 10) for appeal grounds, but not in the final orders.

Art. 42 BGG

Cited in the reasons section (Order 10) for appeal requirements, but not in the final orders.

Art. 90 ff. BGG

Cited in the reasons section (Order 10) regarding the possibility of appeal, but not in the final orders.

Art. 78 ff. BGG

Cited in the reasons section (Order 10) regarding the possibility of appeal, but not in the final orders.

ATSG

Cited in the reasons section (Order 7d) as the relevant federal law regarding social insurance claims, which is confirmed in the dispositive.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 05.11.2007

Fallnummer: · 21 06 100.4

LGVE:

Leitsatz: · Im Neubeurteilungsverfahren gegen den Mann, der im Jahr 2002 in Luzern ein vierjähriges Mädchen vergewaltigte und dessen Grossmutter schwer verletzte, bestätigte das Obergericht den Schuldbefund und die Strafe der Vorinstanz. Wie schon das Kriminalgericht sprach das Obergericht den Täter nebst anderen Delikten der grausamen Vergewaltigung schuldig und verurteilte ihn zu einer siebenjährigen Freiheitsstrafe. Überdies ordnete es gestützt auf zwei psychiatrische Gutachten eine stationäre psychotherapeutische Behandlung des Täters in einer spezialisierten, geschlossenen Einrichtung (nach revidiertem Strafrecht) an.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.