Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
21 05 172 • KG LU 21 05 172 Generato dall'IA

Speeding Conviction Upheld Despite Non-Compliance with Trailing Method Instructions

Numero d'incarto 21 05 172
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant was accused of exceeding the highway speed limit by at least 33 km/h based on police officers following the vehicle over approximately 18 kilometers, and the defendant appealed, arguing that the police failed to adhere to the Technical Instructions of the Federal Department of Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (UVEK) regarding speed checks, specifically concerning the trailing method. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, reasoning that the UVEK Instructions lack the character of legal norms and do not bind the judge's free evaluation of the evidence; therefore, whether the speeding was sufficiently proven in the specific case must be determined by the court's free judicial assessment of the evidence, even if standard procedural requirements regarding trailing distance were not met.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 4a Abs. 1 VRV; § 182 Abs. 2 StPO. Den Technischen Weisungen des UVEK über Geschwindigkeitskontrollen im Strassenverkehr kommt kein Rechtsnormcharakter zu. Ob eine Geschwindigkeitsüberschreitung dem Angeschuldigten im konkreten Fall rechtsgenüglich nachgewiesen werden kann, ist in freier richterlicher Würdigung der Beweise zu beurteilen. | Strassenverkehrsrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
principio della libertà di prova superamento del limite di velocità controllo di polizia conformità alle norme tecniche abbandono del procedimento per infrazione stradale sorpasso non consentito

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 4a Abs. 1 VRV

Cited in the decision's summary regarding the legal character of the UVEK technical instructions.

§ 182 Abs. 2 StPO

Cited in the decision's summary concerning the free judicial assessment of evidence in speed limit cases.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strassenverkehrsrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 14.02.2006

Fallnummer: · 21 05 172

LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 60

Leitsatz: · Art. 4a Abs. 1 VRV; § 182 Abs. 2 StPO. Den Technischen Weisungen des UVEK über Geschwindigkeitskontrollen im Strassenverkehr kommt kein Rechtsnormcharakter zu. Ob eine Geschwindigkeitsüberschreitung dem Angeschuldigten im konkreten Fall rechtsgenüglich nachgewiesen werden kann, ist in freier richterlicher Würdigung der Beweise zu beurteilen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.