Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
21 04 262 • KG LU 21 04 262 Generato dall'IA

Animal Cruelty Conviction Upheld for Torturous Dog Killing

Numero d'incarto 21 04 262
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court upheld the conviction for animal cruelty against an individual who fatally beat their dog with a wooden racket, affirming that intentionally killing an animal in a torturous manner constitutes a violation of the Animal Protection Act. The court reasoned that the repeated blows inflicted prolonged and significant pain because the method of killing, an insufficiently effective blow, did not ensure immediate stunning as required by law, deeming the killing torturous under the relevant statutes, particularly since the method is recognized as inappropriate for similar-sized animals.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 22 Abs. 2 lit. a und 27 Abs. 1 lit. b TSchG. Wer einen Hund mit mehreren Schlägen zu Tode prügelt, macht sich der Tierquälerei schuldig. | Strafrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
trattamento crudele e degradante omicidio passionale aggravamento della pena dimostrazione di un danno irreparabile aggressione fisica decisione penale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 27 Abs. 1 lit. b i.V.m
Art. 22 Abs. 2 lit. a TSchG
This provision is cited in the concluding decision to establish the conviction for animal cruelty through torturous killing.
Art. 27 Abs. 1 lit. c i.V.m
Art. 22 Abs. 2 lit. b TSchG
Leitsatz: · Art. 22 Abs.
Art. 20 Abs. 1 TSchG
Art. 21 Abs. 1 TSchG
Art. 27 Abs. 1 lit. b TSchG
This provision is cited in the concluding decision as the basis for the conviction for animal cruelty through torturous killing.
Generato dall'IA
21 03 170
Appellate Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based on Objective Ruthlessness
2Q4 19 13
Animal Cruelty Conviction and Sentencing for Excessive Whipping of Horses
7H 17 247
Appeal Regarding Proportionality of Costs Following Animal Seizure and Euthanasia
7H 21 10
Animal Welfare Seizure Costs Appeal and Enforcement Methods Review

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 22 Abs. 2 lit. a TSchG

This provision is cited in the concluding decision to establish the conviction for animal cruelty through torturous killing.

Art. 27 Abs. 1 lit. b TSchG

This provision is cited in the concluding decision as the basis for the conviction for animal cruelty through torturous killing.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 22.03.2005

Fallnummer: · 21 04 262

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 57

Leitsatz: · Art. 22 Abs. 2 lit. a und 27 Abs. 1 lit. b TSchG. Wer einen Hund mit mehreren Schlägen zu Tode prügelt, macht sich der Tierquälerei schuldig.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.