Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
21 03 90 • KG LU 21 03 90 Generato dall'IA

Partial Appeal Against Criminal Disposition Inadmissible

Numero d'incarto 21 03 90
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a case where an individual accepted a criminal disposition but subsequently filed an appeal specifically against the court-ordered confiscation of weapons, the High Court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the local criminal procedure code does not recognize partial finality for such dispositions. The court reasoned that confiscation ordered as a non-independent part of a criminal disposition (§ 132 StPO) must be challenged integrally by rejecting the entire disposition (§ 133 StPO) rather than through a separate appeal against a specific element, rendering the instruction to appeal the confiscation separately erroneous.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§§ 132 ff. und 252 StPO; Art. 58 StGB. Die Strafverfügung kann nur als Ganzes angenommen werden, denn der luzernischen Strafprozessordnung ist das Institut der Teilrechtskraft fremd. Ist der Betroffene mit einem Teil der Strafverfügung - und sei dies "nur" eine dort angeordnete Einziehung - nicht einverstanden, hat er die Strafverfügung integral (durch Ein-sprache bzw. Nichtannahme) und nicht separat mit Rekurs an das Obergericht anzufechten. | Strafprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
confisca penale codice di procedura penale autorizzazione parziale impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio irresponsabilità eccezione di incostituzionalità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 58 StGB
und 252 StPO; Art. 58 StGB.
§ 252 StPO
The appeal was not admitted because the law does not explicitly provide for an appeal in this specific context.
§ 133ter StPO
Cited to explain the correct procedure (integral challenge by non-acceptance) that should have been followed instead of the appeal filed.
Generato dall'IA
1C 15 25
Admissibility of Partial Claim in Procedural Order Not Appealable
4M 20 3
Prosecutor's Right to Cross-Appeal Confiscation Decision in Criminal Appeal
V 93 60
Appealability of Remand Order Lacking Current Legal Interest
OG 1992 65
Appeal Against Custody Order Inadmissible Due to Release; Compensation Remitted to Civil Court
2N 13 74
Complainant Lacks Standing to Appeal Partial Dismissal Order in Document Offense Case

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 252 StPO

The appeal was not admitted because the law does not explicitly provide for an appeal in this specific context.

§ 133ter StPO

Cited to explain the correct procedure (integral challenge by non-acceptance) that should have been followed instead of the appeal filed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 11.08.2003

Fallnummer: · 21 03 90

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 71

Leitsatz: · §§ 132 ff. und 252 StPO; Art. 58 StGB. Die Strafverfügung kann nur als Ganzes angenommen werden, denn der luzernischen Strafprozessordnung ist das Institut der Teilrechtskraft fremd. Ist der Betroffene mit einem Teil der Strafverfügung - und sei dies "nur" eine dort angeordnete Einziehung - nicht einverstanden, hat er die Strafverfügung integral (durch Ein-sprache bzw. Nichtannahme) und nicht separat mit Rekurs an das Obergericht anzufechten.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.