Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
11 09 55 • KG LU 11 09 55 Generato dall'IA

Driver Compensation for Excess Overtime Distinction (OR/ArG)

Numero d'incarto 11 09 55
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed a dispute over compensation for additional work performed by a driver after the employment relationship ended, clarifying the legal distinction between overtime ("Überstunden") and excess overtime ("Überzeit") under the Code of Obligations (OR) and the Working Hours Act (ArG). The court reasoned that for drivers, the statutory weekly maximum working time is 46 hours, as defined by specific regulation for professional drivers; work performed beyond this limit constitutes "Überzeit," which, under mandatory law, must be compensated with base pay plus a surcharge or compensated with equivalent time off, regardless of any contractual agreement seeking to waive this compensation, which was only validly waived for hours worked up to the 46-hour limit ("Überstunden").

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 321c OR, Art. 13 ArG, Art. 321c Abs. 3 OR, Art. 13 Abs. 2 ArG, Art. 13 Abs. 1 ArG, Art. 9 ArG; Driver Compensation for Excess Overtime Distinction (OR/ArG): The court reasoned that for drivers, the statutory weekly maximum working time is 46 hours, as defined by specific regulation for professional drivers; work performed beyond this limit constitutes "Überzeit," which, under mandatory law, must be compensated with base pay plus a surcharge or compensated with equivalent time off, regardless of any contractual agreement seeking to waive this compensation, which was only validly waived for hours worked up to the 46-hour limit ("Überstunden").

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
compensazione delle ore straordinarie durata legale del lavoro obblighi contrattuali rapporto di lavoro limiti legali pagamento continuato del salario

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 321c OR
Cited in the substantive reasoning regarding the remuneration of overtime (Überstunden).
Art. 13 ArG
Cited as the mandatory provision governing the compensation for work performed beyond the maximum weekly working hours (Überzeit).
Art. 321c Abs. 3 OR
17 Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art.
Art. 13 Abs. 2 ArG
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 16.03.2010 Fallnummer: · 11 09 55 LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 17 Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art. 13 ArG. Unterscheidung zwischen Überstundenund Überzeitarbeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.
Art. 13 Abs. 1 ArG
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 16.03.2010 Fallnummer: · 11 09 55 LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 17 Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art. 13 ArG. Unterscheidung zwischen Überstundenund Überzeitarbeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.
Art. 9 ArG
Art. 56 SVG
Art. 6 Abs. 1 dieser

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
4C.142/2005
Executive Secretary's Claim for Unproven Overtime Denied.
BGE 126 III 337
Employee Overtime Compensation and Mandatory Labor Law Protections
Generato dall'IA
S 92 422
Appeal Timeliness and Employee Status of Auxiliary Taxi Driver
11 98 99
Employee v. Employer: Unpaid Overtime Compensation and Evidentiary Predicament
1B 11 63
Overtime Compensation During Immediate Termination Release
11 05 37
Wage Claim Confirmation Despite Employer Overpayment Offset Denial and Contributory Fault Irrelevance

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 321c OR

Cited in the substantive reasoning regarding the remuneration of overtime (Überstunden).

Art. 13 ArG

Cited as the mandatory provision governing the compensation for work performed beyond the maximum weekly working hours (Überzeit).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 16.03.2010 Fallnummer: · 11 09 55 LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 17 Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art. 13 ArG. Unterscheidung zwischen Überstundenund Überzeitarbeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.