Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
11 08 84 • KG LU 11 08 84 Generato dall'IA

Gastronomy Overtime Dispute: Employee Records Upheld Against Employer's Late Counter-Evidence

Numero d'incarto 11 08 84
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed a dispute over compensation for overtime hours claimed by an employee in the gastronomy sector, where the employer challenged the overtime calculation based on the employee's submitted time records, arguing against being denied the opportunity to present counter-evidence. The court reasoned that under the applicable collective agreement, the employee's time records serve as admissible evidence when the employer fails to keep proper work-time documentation, and since the employee regularly submitted these monthly records, the employer was deemed to have knowledge of and implicitly accept them by not objecting. Consequently, the employer's subsequent attempt to disprove the recorded hours via witness testimony was deemed irrelevant because the employer had effectively acknowledged the records' accuracy by failing to raise timely objections, as a pattern of accepting the regular submissions implies acceptance of their correctness.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 321c OR; Art. 21 Abs. 3 L-GAV. Beweislast und Entschädigung für Überstundenarbeit. Arbeitszeitkontrolle des Mitarbeiters als Beweismittel. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
registrazione delle ore di lavoro compensazione delle ore straordinarie contratto collettivo testimonianza consegna dell'opera prove irrilevanti

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 321c OR
Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art.
Art. 21 Abs. 3 L-GAV
321c OR; Art. 21 Abs. 3 L-GAV.
Art. 15 Abs. 4 L-GAV

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 17.11.2008

Fallnummer: · 11 08 84

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 14

Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art. 21 Abs. 3 L-GAV. Beweislast und Entschädigung für Überstundenarbeit. Arbeitszeitkontrolle des Mitarbeiters als Beweismittel.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.