Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
11 06 145 • KG LU 11 06 145 Generato dall'IA

Personality Infringement Due to Defamatory Statements in Labor Dispute

Numero d'incarto 11 06 145
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party sought provisional measures against another for alleged unlawful infringement of personal rights under Art. 28 of the Civil Code due to statements made in leaflets and online, claiming the opponent falsely portrayed them as an uncontrolled, violent employer forcing loyalty from staff. The court affirmed that while strong language is permissible in labor disputes, value judgments such as "shameless" and "absolute disrespect towards one's own staff," as well as accusations of shamelessly exploiting the economic dependence of employees, exceed the permissible limit for expression by unnecessarily and injuriously degrading the individual, thus constituting a personality infringement under Art. 28 ZGB.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 28 ZGB. Werturteile wie "schamlos" und "absolute Respektlosigkeit gegenüber der eigenen Belegschaft" sind persönlichkeitsverletzend im Sinne von Art. 28 ZGB. | Personenrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lesione della personalità controversie di lavoro valore litigioso diritti economici diffamazione mobbing

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 28 ZGB
Cited to determine that the judgments regarding conduct as 'shameless' and 'absolute disrespect towards one's own staff' violate personal rights.
Art. 28c ZGB
Mentioned in the context of the petition for provisional measures based on a violation of personal rights.
Art. 28c Abs. 1 ZGB
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
This provision is typically used for imposing costs, but since the provided text does not contain a numbered dispositive ordering costs based on this article, it is excluded based on the strict rule of only including provisions cited in the final numbered orders. (Note: The provided text seems to be an excerpt focusing on reasoning, and the actual numbered dispositive with cost implications is missing or not fully provided in the requested format to cite a cost provision.)

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 126 III 308
Generato dall'IA
11 01 93
Employee Dismissal for Workplace Insult
11 06 153
Directory Publisher Accusations and Personality Rights
21 10 58
Attorney's Psychiatric Remarks in Tenancy Dispute Not Defamatory Due to Good Faith Belief in Complainant's Abnormal Behavior
V 05 237 2
Damages for Unlawful Ordinary Termination of Public-Law Employment and Scope of Compensation
11 08 80
Assertion of Imminent Threat Required for Injunction Against Private Defamatory Statements

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 28 ZGB

Cited to determine that the judgments regarding conduct as 'shameless' and 'absolute disrespect towards one's own staff' violate personal rights.

Art. 28c ZGB

Mentioned in the context of the petition for provisional measures based on a violation of personal rights.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

This provision is typically used for imposing costs, but since the provided text does not contain a numbered dispositive ordering costs based on this article, it is excluded based on the strict rule of only including provisions cited in the final numbered orders. (Note: The provided text seems to be an excerpt focusing on reasoning, and the actual numbered dispositive with cost implications is missing or not fully provided in the requested format to cite a cost provision.)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Personenrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 18.12.2006

Fallnummer: · 11 06 145

LGVE: · 2007 I Nr. 3

Leitsatz: · Art. 28 ZGB. Werturteile wie "schamlos" und "absolute Respektlosigkeit gegenüber der eigenen Belegschaft" sind persönlichkeitsverletzend im Sinne von Art. 28 ZGB.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.