Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
11 02 101 • KG LU 11 02 101 Generato dall'IA

Wage Underpayment Penalty Reduction in Collective Bargaining Dispute

Numero d'incarto 11 02 101
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a dispute concerning the construction industry's collective bargaining agreement (LMV), an administrative review board imposed a contractual penalty on an employer for failing to pay the correct base wages to three employees, amounting to an underpayment of CHF 23,577.05, though the employer promptly corrected the arrears and argued the failure was unintentional. The lower court reduced the initially imposed penalty, and upon appeal, the higher court upheld the reduction, reasoning that the board's standard practice of setting the penalty at one-third of the withheld payments was insufficient as it failed to adequately weigh all specified mitigating and aggravating factors on a case-by-case basis, such as the employer's prompt rectification, the minor nature of the remaining issues, and the fact that it was a small family business, justifying the lower penalty amount to still serve the penalty's preventive purpose.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 356 OR; Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV. Landesmantelvertrag für das Bauhauptgewerbe. Bemessung der Konventionalstrafe bei Verletzung gesamtarbeitsvertraglicher Bestimmungen. Eine ständige Praxis, die Konventionalstrafe in Höhe eines Drittels der vorenthaltenen geldwerten Leistungen festzusetzen, wird dem Einzelfall nicht gerecht. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contrattazione collettiva circostanze attenuanti pena convenzionale contratto di factoring salario minimo trattenuta

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 356 OR
This provision is cited in the decision summary and appears in the body text, indicating it is part of the legal framework for the dispute, although the dispositive orders themselves are missing specific article citations beyond the general mention.
Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV
This provision, governing the criteria for setting the contractual penalty, is explicitly cited in the leading part of the decision, justifying the court's reasoning on the penalty calculation.
Art. 79 Abs. 2 lit. b LMV
Art. 79 Abs. 3 lit. a-f LMV

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 356 OR

This provision is cited in the decision summary and appears in the body text, indicating it is part of the legal framework for the dispute, although the dispositive orders themselves are missing specific article citations beyond the general mention.

Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV

This provision, governing the criteria for setting the contractual penalty, is explicitly cited in the leading part of the decision, justifying the court's reasoning on the penalty calculation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 02.12.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 02 101

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 25

Leitsatz: · Art. 356 OR; Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV. Landesmantelvertrag für das Bauhauptgewerbe. Bemessung der Konventionalstrafe bei Verletzung gesamtarbeitsvertraglicher Bestimmungen. Eine ständige Praxis, die Konventionalstrafe in Höhe eines Drittels der vorenthaltenen geldwerten Leistungen festzusetzen, wird dem Einzelfall nicht gerecht.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.