Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
01 03 9 • KG LU 01 03 9 Generato dall'IA

Unfair Competition Prospectus Distribution Address Request Denial

Numero d'incarto 01 03 9
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a dispute concerning unfair competition, an applicant sought an interim measure to prohibit the distribution of a prospectus and requested the addresses of the recipients, claiming this was necessary to assess the scope of the alleged illegality and to rectify the content with the recipients beforehand. The court ruled that the purpose of a precautionary evidentiary measure under Article 14 of the Unfair Competition Act in conjunction with Article 28c(2)(2) of the Civil Code is to prevent loss of evidence due to time-related disadvantages, not to pre-litigationally correct the allegedly unlawful content of a prospectus with the addressees. Since the applicant failed to demonstrate the urgency of obtaining the addresses or that they would otherwise be destroyed, and since such an address request amounted to an inadmissible pre-litigation document production without a proven entitlement, the request for the addresses was denied.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 14 UWG; Art. 28c Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 ZGB. Zweck dieser Beweissicherungsmassnahme kann nicht sein, den angeblich rechtswidrigen Inhalt eines Prospekts bei dessen Adressaten vorprozessual richtig zu stellen. | UWG (unlauterer Wettbewerb)

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
concorrenza sleale causa civile produzione di documenti ripartizione provvisoria esclusione dalla procedura di appalto gara d'appalto infruttuosa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 14 UWG

This provision is cited in the decision section describing the scope of the evidence preservation measure sought.

Art. 28c Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 ZGB

This provision is cited in the decision section describing the scope of the evidence preservation measure sought.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · UWG (unlauterer Wettbewerb)

Entscheiddatum: · 12.02.2004

Fallnummer: · 01 03 9

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 31

Leitsatz: · Art. 14 UWG; Art. 28c Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 ZGB. Zweck dieser Beweissicherungsmassnahme kann nicht sein, den angeblich rechtswidrigen Inhalt eines Prospekts bei dessen Adressaten vorprozessual richtig zu stellen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.