Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/569/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/569/2004 Generato dall'IA

Retroactive Statute Challenged on Due Process and Contract Grounds

Numero d'incarto ATAS/569/2004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A dispute arose concerning whether a statute requiring payment for services rendered prior to the law's enactment, even for continuing obligations, was an unconstitutional retroactive application violating due process or impairing contracts. The court reasoned that the statute served a legitimate public purpose by addressing an existing problem and that the retroactive application was not unduly harsh or oppressive given the nature of the continuing obligation and the public benefit achieved, thus upholding the statute against the constitutional challenges.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Retroactive Statute Challenged on Due Process and Contract Grounds: The court reasoned that the statute served a legitimate public purpose by addressing an existing problem and that the retroactive application was not unduly harsh or oppressive given the nature of the continuing obligation and the public benefit achieved, thus upholding the statute against the constitutional challenges.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indebito obbligo di contrattare prestazione di diritto pubblico prestazioni erogate proseguimento dell'erogazione delle prestazioni retroattività

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision was cited to regulate the costs of the proceedings concerning the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
A/2735/2006
Property Rights Challenge to Retroactive Statute
A/253/2005
Statute Retroactivity in Enforcement Actions
A/3612/2007
Tax Statute Retroactivity Challenge
A/1561/2003
Contract Interpretation and Retroactive Amendment Application
A/1406/2004
Statutory Assessment Retroactivity and Due Process Challenge

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited to regulate the costs of the proceedings concerning the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

               "#$%"$&"'"( ")*+"'$$&

,,

- , .-( (  -,  (

'/  01    2%  '$$& 



3   -  -(  ( ! !)!* "#$%#&'(



#$*

45555555555 ,( !+,!*



            !

   20-2  

  !)!  )&+ 3#*$$ *  #)) ! ./ ,*  *$& ( ! ,*& !)&&$*$&,4

+*&$*!3*$&$3&5!#&*4

6!&!#)3*$&#3*#!3*$&!78&$0//14 6#*!&$*$*3*$&($$#&#9#!$&#3$$3#* #!!$#$#)3$#))!.,* :!+,!*3$!3'*   

  -./-0//1  2-2  

,   3 ( , .-( (  -,  (

 600   7

809   :  7   6! 2*' (;<

; #$( 9 <   <  !##*!( :)#$$!=#&$&)&$+(.,* 

0 6'#!)$$:!>#& 

 #$(?@@@@@@@@@@< !#AA)$(3'*$$#)) 

1 6'#!)$$:!>#& 

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

  -./-0//1