Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
8C_203/2011 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Public Service Appeal and Cost Allocation

Numero d'incarto 8C_203/2011
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an individual who filed a public law appeal and a subsidiary constitutional appeal against a judgment from the Administrative Chamber of the Geneva Court of Justice. The individual later submitted a letter to withdraw these appeals, referencing a comparable ruling issued earlier by the Swiss Federal Tribunal. Consequently, the Tribunal acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeals and decided to remove the case from its docket, while imposing court fees on the appellant. The ruling also noted that the opposing party, which acted in the exercise of its official duties, is not entitled to recover costs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 68 al. 3 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF, art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF; Withdrawal of Public Service Appeal and Cost Allocation: The individual later submitted a letter to withdraw these appeals, referencing a comparable ruling issued earlier by the Swiss Federal Tribunal. Consequently, the Tribunal acknowledged the withdrawal of the appeals and decided to remove the case from its docket, while imposing court fees on the appellant. The ruling also noted that the opposing party, which acted in the exercise of its official duties, is not entitled to recover costs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servizio pubblico spese di procedura surrogazione dell'ente pubblico ritiro dell'azione giudiziaria compenso per prestazioni divieto di esercizio della professione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF

Cited in relation to Art. 73 al. 1 PCF for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeals and striking the case from the roll.

art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF

Cited as the basis for ordering the appellant, who withdrew the appeal, to pay the court costs.

art. 68 al. 3 LTF

Cited as the basis for ruling that the respondent is not entitled to legal costs.

art. 73 al. 1 PCF

Cited in relation to Art. 32 al. 2 and 71 LTF for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeals and striking the case from the roll.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Sentenze successive che citano questa decisione (1)

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

8C_203/2011

Ordonnance du 6 février 2012

Ire Cour de droit social

Composition

M. le Juge Frésard, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffière: Mme von Zwehl.

Participants à la procédure

N.________,

représenté par Me Jean-Michel Dolivo, avocat,

recourant,

contre

Les Transports Publics Genevois, route de la Chapelle 1, 1212 Grand-Lancy,

représentés par Me Gabriel Aubert, avocat,

intimés.

Objet

Droit de la fonction publique (retrait du recours),

recours contre le jugement de la Cour de justice

de la République et canton de Genève, Chambre administrative, du 25 janvier 2011.

Vu:

le recours en matière de droit public et le recours constitutionnel subsidiaire interjetés par N.________ le 10 mars 2011 (timbre postal) contre un jugement de la Cour de justice de la République et canton de Genève, Chambre administrative, du 25 janvier 2011,

la lettre du 1er février 2012 par laquelle N.________ déclare retirer les recours compte tenu de l'arrêt 8C_200/2011 du 13 janvier 2012 rendu par le Tribunal fédéral dans une affaire comparable,

considérant:

qu'il y a lieu de prendre acte du retrait des recours et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF ),

que celui qui retire un recours doit, en principe, être considéré comme une partie succombante, astreinte au paiement des frais de justice encourus jusque-là ( art. 66 al. 1 et 2 LTF ; cf. ordonnances 2C_1047/2011 du 25 janvier 2012 et 1C_425/2011 du 21 novembre 2011),

que la partie intimée, qui a agi dans l'exercice de ses attributions officielles, n'a pas droit à des dépens ( art. 68 al. 3 LTF ; ATF 134 II 117 consid. 7 p. 118; DTA 2010 p. 265 consid. 6.2 [8C_151/2010]),

par ces motifs, le Juge unique ordonne:

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours en matière de droit public et du recours constitutionnel subsidiaire.

2. Les frais judiciaires de 100 fr. sont mis à la charge du recourant.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et à la Cour de justice de la République et canton de Genève, Chambre administrative.

Lucerne, le 6 février 2012

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge unique:

La Greffière:

Frésard von Zwehl