Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VR.2015.00002 • VG ZH VR.2015.00002 Generato dall'IA

Expropriation Compensation Upheld for Bicycle Path Expansion

Numero d'incarto VR.2015.00002
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court upheld the compensation awarded for the formal expropriation of agricultural land for a bicycle path expansion, confirming that the valuation method used by the appraisal commission, based on comparable sales for agricultural land in the canton, was appropriate and yielded a legally compliant maximum price. The court reasoned that the compensation amount is independent of the land's potential future use and ruled against granting the appellant an additional involuntary surrender premium.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 BGBB, Art. 26 Abs. II BV, § 46 AbtrG, § 63 Abs. II VRG; Expropriation Compensation Upheld for Bicycle Path Expansion: The court reasoned that the compensation amount is independent of the land's potential future use and ruled against granting the appellant an additional involuntary surrender premium.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità d'espropriazione fondo agricolo prezzo del terreno diritto fondiario riscatto di un diritto reale limitato legge sui percorsi pedonali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 BGBB
This provision is cited, likely concerning the calculation or valuation method applied to the property.
Art. 26 Abs. II BV
66 BGBB Art. 26 Abs. II BV § 63 Abs.
§ 46 AbtrG
This provision appears to form the basis for the substantive decision regarding the amount of compensation, as the appeal concerning the compensation amount was dismissed.
§ 63 Abs. II VRG
This procedural provision is cited in the context of the costs imposed on the appellant.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2002.00272
Bike Path Designation and Compensation Claims
VB.2019.00175
Land Expropriation Upheld for Road Safety and Sidewalk Construction
VR.2012.00003
Expropriation Compensation and Sidewalk Contributions Dispute
VB.2004.00427
Land Consolidation Cooperative Compensation for Expropriated Pathway Parcels

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 46 AbtrG

This provision appears to form the basis for the substantive decision regarding the amount of compensation, as the appeal concerning the compensation amount was dismissed.

Art. 66 BGBB

This provision is cited, likely concerning the calculation or valuation method applied to the property.

§ 63 Abs. II VRG

This procedural provision is cited in the context of the costs imposed on the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VR.2015.00002

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=216382&W10_KEY=13317082&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VR.2015.00002 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 23.06.2016 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/3. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Das Bundesgericht hat eine Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten gegen diesen Entscheid am 27.03.2017 abgewiesen. · Rechtsgebiet: · Enteignungsrecht · Betreff: · Formelle Enteignung · Formelle Enteignung (Höhe der Entschädigung). [Der Rekurrent wird für die im Zusammenhang mit dem Ausbau eines Velowegs vorgenommene Enteignung seines Landes mit dem höchstmöglichen Preis für Landwirtschaftsland im Kanton Zürich entschädigt.] Die von der Schätzungskommission angewandte Methode zur Festlegung des Höchstpreises im Kanton Zürich (Vergleichsmethode) ist nicht zu beanstanden, und das ermittelte Ergebnis erweist sich als rechtskonform (E. 2.4).

Die Höhe der Entschädigung ist nicht von der zukünftigen Nutzung des abgetretenen Landes abhängig (E. 2.5). Dem Rekurrenten ist kein Unfreiwilligkeitszuschlag zu gewähren (E. 2.8). Kosten (E. 3). Abweisung des Rekurses. · --- · Stichworte: · ABTRETUNG ENTEIGNUNG ENTEIGNUNGSENTSCHÄDIGUNG FORMELLE ENTEIGNUNG LANDWIRTSCHAFTSZONE SCHÄTZUNGSKOMMISSION UNFREIWILLIGKEITSZUSCHLAG VERGLEICHSPREISE VERKEHRSWERT · Rechtsnormen: · § 11 AbtrG § 13 Abs. I AbtrG § 13 Abs. II AbtrG § 46 AbtrG Art. 66 BGBB Art. 26 Abs. II BV § 63 Abs. II VRG · Publikationen:

· - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3