Legislator Corpus juridique & Jurisprudence
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2023 21 • VG SZ I 2023 21 Structuré par IA

I 2023 21 — Accident Insurance Causality Appeal Affirmation

Numéro de cause I 2023 21 (SZ_VG_003_I-2023-21_2023-09-06)
Autorité / Tribunal
Date de la décision
Juridiction Canton de Schwytz — Tribunaux cantonaux (CH-SZ)
Ouvrir la source officielle ↗ Miroir Entscheidsuche ↗ Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse de l'arrêt (Faits & Considérants)

Structuré par IA

A party appealed a decision regarding accident insurance coverage, disputing the causal link between an accident and subsequent health issues. The court reviewed the appeal, which challenged the lower instance's assessment of causality in the context of occupational injury claims, ultimately affirming the prior decision based on the presented evidence and legal standards concerning the required nexus between the accident and the claimed disability or injury.

Regeste / Sommaire juridique

Structuré par IA
A party appealed a decision regarding accident insurance coverage, disputing the causal link between an accident and subsequent health issues. The court reviewed the appeal, which challenged the lower instance's assessment of causality in the context of occupational injury claims, ultimately affirming the prior decision based on the presented evidence and legal standards concerning the required nexus between the accident and the claimed disability or injury.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte intégral de la décision — I 2023 21

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 21 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 6. September 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Kausalität) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: