Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II PK 159/11 Généré par l'IA

Appeal dismissed; failure to raise procedural objection under Art. 162 CPC forfeits the claim in cassation.

Numéro de cause II PK 159/11
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a labor dispute judgment regarding a non-compete agreement. The appellant argued the lower court erred by enforcing a non-compete clause signed by a non-authorized representative, but failed to raise this procedural defect under Article 162 of the Code of Civil Procedure during the appeal stage. The court ruled that such a failure results in the irrevocable loss of the objection, rendering the substantive argument inadmissible in the cassation proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 162 k.p.c.; Art. 210 § 1 k.s.h.; Art. 58 § 1 k.c.: Failure to raise a procedural objection under Article 162 of the Code of Civil Procedure during the appeal results in the irrevocable loss of that objection, precluding its consideration in cassation proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procedural objection forfeiture cassation appeal dismissal non-compete agreement validity authorized representative requirement waiver of procedural rights

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 162 k.p.c.
Art. 210 § 1 k.s.h.
Art. 58 § 1 k.c.
Art. 1012 § 1 k.p.
Art. 1012 § 3 k.p.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 162 k.p.c
art. 65 k.c
art. 300 k.p

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PK 501/03
Non-authorized post-employment non-compete agreement signed by board chair is void under Polish law.
I PK 453/02
Non-compete clause invalid without explicit time limit; employer failed to define duration in employment contract.
I PK 208/09
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; non-collegial board resolution invalidating non-compete agreement and compensation claim.
I PK 82/08
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; non-collegial board will cannot be replaced by custom or later agreements.
I PK 681/03
Supreme Court allows non-compete clause post-employment despite single-signatory execution by employer.
III CZP 55/05
Plaintiff loses appeal right for procedural errors in non-appealable rulings if not raised immediately.
III CZP 50/08
Appeal court dismissed procedural violation claim due to failure to object under Civil Procedure Code.
V CSK 234/09
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against manager liability judgment despite flawed reasoning due to statutory exemption.
II PK 127/09
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding patent fee non-payment, ruling final decision only confirms lack of patent conditions.
III CK 90/04
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on double deposit return, ruling contract terminated by mutual consent.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet