Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II PK 127/09 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding patent fee non-payment, ruling final decision only confirms lack of patent conditions.

Numéro de cause II PK 127/09
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the cassation appeal filed by multiple plaintiffs against KGHM P.M. SA regarding unpaid patent protection fees. The lower court had rejected the plaintiffs' claim for remuneration based on a rationalization project agreement, noting that the patent office's final decision regarding fee payment only conditionally confirmed the absence of statutory patent conditions. The court held that the final decision does not grant patent protection but merely suspends it until fees are paid, and thus the cassation arguments regarding fact-finding and procedural errors were inadmissible.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 316 ust. 4 Prawa własności przemysłowej; Art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.: The final decision on patent fees only conditionally confirms lack of patent conditions without granting protection, and cassation cannot challenge fact-finding or evidence evaluation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
patent protection conditions protection fee payment cassation appeal dismissal industrial property law remuneration for rationalization procedural inadmissibility conditional patent grant

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 316 ust. 4 Prawa własności przemysłowej
Art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 382 k.p.c.
Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 162 k.p.c.
Art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 385 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
uchwała z dnia 27 października 2005 r., III CZP 55/05 (OSNC 2006 nr 9, poz. 144)
III CZP 50/08
Appeal court dismissed procedural violation claim due to failure to object under Civil Procedure Code.
V CSK 131/08
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on mandatory buyout price, ruling statutory review is the exclusive remedy.
III CZP 49/07
Appeal court bound by procedural but not material claims; voidness considered ex officio.
II PK 280/07
III CZP 55/05
Plaintiff loses appeal right for procedural errors in non-appealable rulings if not raised immediately.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet