Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I UK 380/07 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court quashes cassation ruling on social security farmer insurance status due to procedural errors.

Numéro de cause I UK 380/07
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court quashed the cassation judgment and remanded the case to the Court of Appeal in Krakow for a new decision. The applicant, a farmer with concurrent non-farmer business activities, had previously been declared ineligible for farmer social insurance due to a missing declaration of choice. The court found the lower court failed to clarify whether the decision to revoke insurance was based on new evidence or pre-existing circumstances, violating procedural requirements. Consequently, the Supreme Court determined the correct legal basis for revoking the insurance was not properly applied, necessitating a retrial.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 39 ust. 4 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; Art. 83a ust. 1 i 2 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych: When a final decision is found to be erroneous from the outset due to pre-existing circumstances, the procedure for retrial based on new evidence does not apply, and the decision must be annulled or changed according to administrative procedure rules.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
farmer social insurance declaration of choice retrial procedure pre-existing circumstances administrative annulment

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 39 ust. 4 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 52 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 83a ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 83a ust. 2 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 366 k.p.c
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 60 k.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
II UK 359/03
Supreme Court quashes social security decision due to procedural error in cassation review regarding administrative retrial grounds.
II UK 295/04
Social security insurance termination for farmers is not a retrial but a new proceeding based on statutory requirements.
II UK 314/07
II UK 111/03
I UK 95/05
Social security law mandates contributions during business suspension; ZUS cannot exempt insured persons from this obligation.
I UK 300/06
Supreme Court dismisses social security appeal, ruling business suspension does not exempt mandatory insurance obligations.
II UK 41/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; Article 5a Social Security Act excludes farmers who start business after becoming farmers.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet