Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I UZ 33/05 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal for filing late, ruling statutory deadlines run continuously despite appointed counsel changes.

Numéro de cause I UZ 33/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the insured's appeal against a social security disability pension decision, ruling the appeal was filed outside the statutory one-month deadline. The appellant argued the deadline should restart upon the appointment of a new court-appointed lawyer, but the court held that such appointments do not interrupt the continuous running of procedural time limits. Consequently, the court determined that the appellant failed to file the appeal within the legally prescribed period and could not rely on the appointment of new counsel to justify the delay.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; The statutory one-month period for filing a cassation appeal runs continuously and is not interrupted or suspended by the appointment of new court-appointed counsel, unless a specific request for time restoration is filed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cassation appeal deadline court appointed counsel continuous time limit procedural time restoration social security pension Supreme Court ruling statutory time bar

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 k.p.c.
Art. 397 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 3934 § 1 k.p.c
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet