Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II UZ 51/01 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; filing for court-appointed counsel does not extend cassation deadline.

Numéro de cause II UZ 51/01
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the rejection of his cassation, which was filed after the statutory one-month deadline. The appellant argued that the appointment of a court-appointed lawyer should have extended the deadline, citing conflicting precedents and constitutional principles regarding access to court. The Court ruled that the appointment of counsel does not affect the running of the cassation deadline and that any delay caused by the lawyer's inability to meet the deadline must be addressed through a separate request to restore the deadline.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 3934 § 1 KPC; Art. 3935 KPC: The filing of a request to appoint a lawyer by the court does not affect the running of the deadline for filing a cassation; failure to file within the statutory period due to reasons not attributable to the lawyer or the party constitutes a ground only for requesting the restoration of the deadline.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cassation deadline court-appointed lawyer restoration of time limit procedural deadline access to court KPC cassation statutory period

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 3934 § 1 KPC
Art. 3935 KPC
Art. 117 § 1 KPC
Art. 168 § 1 KPC
Art. 385 KPC
Art. 397 § 2 KPC
Art. 39318 § 3 KPC
Art. 77 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 77 ust. 2 Konstytucji RP

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet