Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II UZ 14/96 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court mandates appeal court to appoint counsel ex officio when personal appeal includes such request within statutory deadline.

Numéro de cause II UZ 14/96
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court overturned the Appeal Court's dismissal of Tadeusz T.'s personal appeal, which contained a request for an attorney to be appointed by the court. Although the Appeal Court rejected the appeal citing procedural requirements for legal representation, the Supreme Court found the personal appeal valid because it included a specific request for counsel within the one-month deadline. Consequently, the court ordered the Appeal Court to recognize the request and appoint an attorney rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 393 2 § 1 KPC; Art. 465 § 1 KPC; Art. 117 § 1 KPC: When a party personally files an appeal within the statutory period containing a request for an attorney to be appointed by the court, the court is obligated to process that request and cannot dismiss the appeal solely on the grounds of the party's lack of legal representation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
personal appeal filing attorney appointment ex officio procedural deadline compliance legal representation requirement appeal dismissal grounds

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 393 2 § 1 KPC
Art. 465 § 1 KPC
Art. 117 § 1 KPC
Art. 117 § 2 KPC
Art. 393 4 KPC
Art. 393 12 KPC

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet