Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II PZ 20/05 Généré par l'IA

Appeal filed during lawyer's illness is allowed if illness justified delay and remedy was timely requested.

Numéro de cause II PZ 20/05
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court set aside the lower court's dismissal of the appellant's appeal, which had been filed after the deadline due to the lawyer's illness. The appellant argued that the lawyer's sickness prevented timely filing, while the lower court held that the appeal was submitted too late despite the illness. The court ruled that a lawyer's illness justifying a delay cannot be used to the client's detriment if the request for time extension was made promptly after recovery.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 169 § 1 k.p.c.: If a party's failure to perform a procedural act within the time limit is not due to their fault, the court shall restore the time limit upon request; however, the act performed during the fault-causing circumstance cannot be detrimental to the party if the request for restoration was made with due diligence.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procedural time limit restoration of time lawyer's illness due diligence standard fault in procedure appeal filing civil procedure code

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 169 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 169 § 1 k.p.c
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet