Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PRN 21/94 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court allows extension of statute of limitations for labor dispute due to employee's lack of fault and legal inexperience.

Numéro de cause I PRN 21/94
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court set aside lower court rulings that dismissed an employee's claim for reinstatement due to a missed filing deadline. The employee argued he was not at fault for missing the 14-day limit because of incorrect legal advice and attempts at out-of-court settlement. The court held that the law does not specify a strict form for requesting a deadline extension and requires a subjective assessment of the employee's knowledge and circumstances, finding the lower courts' rigid approach erroneous.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 264 § 2 k.p.; Art. 265 k.p.: The absence of fault in missing a short limitation period must be assessed subjectively based on the employee's education and experience, allowing extensions for minor delays caused by legal misinformation or settlement attempts.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
labor dispute statute of limitations missed deadline employee fault reinstatement claim subjective assessment legal inexperience

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 264 § 2 k.p.
Art. 265 k.p.
Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 264 § 2 k.p
art. 52 k.p
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 265 k.p
art. 264 k.p
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
III PZP 8/86

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet