I PK 22/03
Généré par l'IA
Employer violating social fund spending rules cannot invoke general clauses to avoid liability for damages.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of a union's claim for the return of social fund misappropriation. The employer argued that general clauses in the Civil Code barred liability, but the court held that violating statutory social criteria inherently breaches general principles of coexistence. Consequently, the employer is precluded from using general clauses to escape responsibility for damages caused by such violations.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 8 ust. 1 ustawy o zakładowym funduszu świadczeń socjalnych; Art. 8 k.p.: An employer violating statutory social criteria for fund expenditure cannot invoke general clauses to avoid liability, as such violations inherently breach general principles of coexistence and social-economic purpose.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
social fund expenditure
general clauses
civil code liability
social criteria
coexistence principles
misappropriation damages
employer liability
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 4 marca 1994 r. o zakładowym funduszu świadczeń socjalnych
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 8 k.p
art. 368 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 39312 k.p.c
art. 108 § 2 k.p.c
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAI PKN 579/00
Employer cannot spend social fund money without union agreement violating social criteria.
I PKN 664/98
Supreme Court dismissed union's cassation for failing to negotiate social fund regulations with all union bodies.
I PRN 52/75
I PKN 14/96
Employer dismissed drunk worker; court upheld dismissal citing breach of duty and social norms.
I PKN 55/96
Cassation dismissed for challenging facts within judicial discretion and misusing social coexistence clauses.
I PKN 552/97
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; drunk employee cannot claim social conduct protection for dismissal.
III CZP 62/02
Supreme Court refused to rule on 30-year acquisitive prescription due to premature legal assessment.