Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II UKN 326/98 Généré par l'IA

Partial loss of earning capacity does not equal inability to perform current job under Polish pension law.

Numéro de cause II UKN 326/98
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a truck driver against his denial of a disability pension. The applicant argued that his medical conditions caused a partial loss of earning capacity, but the lower courts correctly determined he could still work within his qualifications. The court ruled that under the amended law, a pension for partial disability requires both a change of job and a lack of hope to recover full capacity after retraining.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 23 ust. 3 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin; Art. 24 ust. 1 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin: Partial loss of earning capacity is not equivalent to the impossibility of performing the current occupation; a disability pension for partial incapacity is granted only upon a change of profession and a lack of prospects for recovery of full work capacity after retraining.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
partial loss of earning capacity disability pension eligibility change of profession requirement retraining prospects assessment Polish social security law medical expert opinion cassation appeal dismissal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 23 ust. 3 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 24 ust. 1 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 1 pkt 2 of the Act amending certain pension laws
Art. 78 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 393 § 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PKN 58/97
Supreme Court dismissed cassation as facts are binding without procedural violation allegations.
I PKN 25/97
Supreme Court dismissed cassation, upholding lower courts' finding that the employer failed to terminate the employment contract within the statutory one-month period.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet