Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PKN 25/97 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismissed cassation, upholding lower courts' finding that the employer failed to terminate the employment contract within the statutory one-month period.

Numéro de cause I PKN 25/97
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a labor court judgment ordering the reinstatement of an employee. The appellant argued that the employer incorrectly calculated the one-month notice period required for termination, claiming the clock should have started later based on new evidence. The court ruled that factual findings made during a properly conducted evidentiary procedure cannot be successfully challenged on cassation and that the employer failed to prove the notice period began after the end of November 1995.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 393 § 1 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 52 § 1, 2 KP: A cassation appeal cannot be based on questioning facts established in a properly conducted evidentiary procedure, and the statutory notice period for termination must be calculated from the date the employer became aware of the grounds for termination unless proven otherwise.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
labor law termination statutory notice period cassation appeal dismissal evidentiary procedure employment contract validity

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 52 § 1 KP
Art. 52 § 2 KP
Art. 393 § 2 KPC

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet