III ZP 52/97
Généré par l'IA
Third fixed-term contract after two prior ones creates indefinite term effect under Art. 25 1 KP.
Pologne (PL)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a third fixed-term contract automatically converts to an indefinite-term relationship. The court held that such a conversion occurs if two prior fixed-term contracts were concluded starting from the law's effective date of June 2, 1996. The decision prioritizes legal stability and avoids disrupting the established practice of counting contracts from the new statutory date.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArt. 25 1 KP; A third successive fixed-term employment contract is legally equivalent to an indefinite-term contract if the two preceding fixed-term contracts were concluded beginning from the entry into force of this provision.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IA
fixed-term employment contracts
indefinite-term conversion
Labor Code Article 25 1
successive employment agreements
transitional period interpretation
labor law stability
statutory effective date
Dispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IAArt. 25 1 KP
Jurisprudence citée
Généré par l'IAI PKN 272/97
Supreme Court allows conversion of fixed-term contracts to open-ended if gaps between prior contracts were under one month.
I PKN 390/97
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding application of indefinite term contract law to pre-implementation fixed-term agreements.
I PZP 52/93
Supreme Court rules that changing an open-ended employment contract to a fixed-term one via notice is inadmissible.