Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PZP 52/93 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court rules that changing an open-ended employment contract to a fixed-term one via notice is inadmissible.

Numéro de cause I PZP 52/93
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court ruled that converting an open-ended employment contract to a fixed-term contract through a terminating notice is legally impermissible. The court distinguished between the legal concept of the contract's type (duration) and its specific terms, emphasizing that the type is determined by the parties' agreement at formation. Consequently, the court held that such a unilateral change by the employer would undermine the stability guarantees provided to employees under open-ended contracts.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 29 § 1 k.p.; Art. 42 § 1 k.p.: The type of an employment contract, defined by its duration, is an autonomous legal concept distinct from its terms; therefore, a unilateral terminating notice cannot validly change an open-ended contract into a fixed-term contract.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
employment contract type open-ended contract fixed-term contract unilateral termination notice labor law stability Kodeks Pracy unilateral modification

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 29 § 1 k.p.
Art. 25 § 1 k.p.
Art. 42 § 1 k.p.
Art. 45 § 1 k.p.
Art. 42 § 2-4 k.p.
art. 42 k.p
art. 42 § 1 k.p
art. 29 § 1 k.p
art. 25 § 1 k.p
art. 56 k.c

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet