Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II PK 291/09 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses mobbing establishment claim when personal rights protection via civil code suffices.

Numéro de cause II PK 291/09
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal seeking to establish that her employer committed mobbing. The lower court found no mobbing occurred and noted the plaintiff could seek personal rights protection under the Civil Code instead. The court ruled that because the Civil Code offers broader preventive protection for personal health rights without requiring medical diagnosis of health disruption, the plaintiff lacked a legal interest in establishing mobbing solely through the labor code.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 189 k.p.c.; Art. 943 § 1, 2 k.p.; Art. 24 k.c.; Art. 111 k.p.c.: Where a worker can seek protection of personal rights under the Civil Code without requiring a medical diagnosis of health disruption, they lack a legal interest in establishing mobbing solely under the Labor Code.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
legal interest in action mobbing establishment personal rights protection civil code vs labor code health disruption requirement cassation appeal dismissal preventive protection

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 189 k.p.c.
Art. 943 § 1, 2 k.p.
Art. 24 k.c.
Art. 111 k.p.c.
Art. 382 k.p.c.
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
Art. 98 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 24 k.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
III CZP 59/98
I CSK 147/05
Supreme Court partially allowed cassation appeal regarding defective soap and dismissed non-monetary claim.
C III 680/34
III CKN 792/98
II UK 271/04
Failure to inform a severely mentally ill party of the need for a lawyer does not void proceedings but may affect the outcome.
II CSK 286/07
Supreme Court dismissed cassation appeal regarding construction contract damages, finding no procedural error in first instance judgment.
II PK 235/06
Cassation dismissed; court held labor court lacks duty to advise on facts not in claim under Art. 4771 § 1 CPC.
III CZP 49/07
Appeal court bound by procedural but not material claims; voidness considered ex officio.
I UK 74/08
Receiving farmer's pension does not strip farmer status if non-farm business is conducted and conditions met.
V CSK 174/07
Supreme Court allows claim for lost profits due to flawed valuation in state forest land auction.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet