Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
JK 03 40 • KG LU JK 03 40 Généré par l'IA

Sale of Forest Land Parcels Versus Division Requiring Permit

Numéro de cause JK 03 40
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed whether the sale of a property comprising several parcels, some forested, constituted a division of private forest requiring a permit under forestry law. The court reasoned that the relevant legal distinction, consistent with established federal jurisprudence, defines "division" as the real separation of previously undivided shares (e.g., within co-ownership), whereas "sale" involves transferring forest property to outside third parties. Since the owner sold distinct, already established forest land parcels to his son, this transaction was classified as a "sale" and not a "division" that would trigger the requirement for a cantonal forestry permit, leading to the annulment of the registration refusal.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 25 Abs. 1 WaG, Art. 50 Abs. 1 WaG, Art. 58 BGBB, § 23 Abs. 1 KWaG; Sale of Forest Land Parcels Versus Division Requiring Permit: The court reasoned that the relevant legal distinction, consistent with established federal jurisprudence, defines "division" as the real separation of previously undivided shares (e.g., within co-ownership), whereas "sale" involves transferring forest property to outside third parties. Since the owner sold distinct, already established forest land parcels to his son, this transaction was classified as a "sale" and not a "division" that would trigger the requirement for a cantonal forestry permit, leading to the annulment of the registration refusal.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
partage de la propriété droit foncier vente d'actions séparation de corps abattage d'arbres servitude

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 25 Abs. 1 WaG
Cited as the main ground, in conjunction with cantonal law, for determining that the transaction was a transfer (Veräusserung) not requiring a permit.
Art. 50 Abs. 1 WaG
Art. 58 BGBB
§ 23 Abs. 1 KWaG
Cited as the main ground, in conjunction with federal law, for determining that the transaction was a transfer (Veräusserung) not requiring a permit.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 110 Ia 92
BGE 106 Ib 57
BGE 106 Ib 62
Généré par l'IA
7H 13 66
Owner v. Canton: Logging Permit in Protection Forest
V 11 103
Co-Owners' Standing to Challenge Timber Harvesting Permit on Forest Property
OG 1991 9
Land Registry Refusal to Record Sales Agreement Over Forest Separation Permit
RRE Nr 1453
Administrative Authority v. Property Owner Regarding Forest Classification on Building Land

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 25 Abs. 1 WaG

Cited as the main ground, in conjunction with cantonal law, for determining that the transaction was a transfer (Veräusserung) not requiring a permit.

§ 23 Abs. 1 KWaG

Cited as the main ground, in conjunction with federal law, for determining that the transaction was a transfer (Veräusserung) not requiring a permit.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Justizkommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 09.04.2004

Fallnummer: · JK 03 40

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 32

Leitsatz: · Art. 25 Abs. 1 WaG, § 23 Abs. 1 KWaG. Abgrenzung zwischen Veräusserung und bewilligungspflichtiger Teilung von Privatwald.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.