Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
21 07 36 • KG LU 21 07 36 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Confiscation of Estimated Illicit Gains Due to Insufficient Judicial Justification

Numéro de cause 21 07 36
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns the confiscation of an alleged illicit financial benefit of CHF 20,000 from an entity following an unauthorized large-scale advertisement, where the initial fine for the offense was uncontested. The appellate court overturned the confiscation order, ruling that while the statute permits estimation of illicit gains, the judge must still provide a legally sufficient justification detailing the basis and calculation of the estimated amount, as a lack of substantiation violates the constitutional right to be heard. Because the initial decision failed to explain how the CHF 20,000 estimate was derived, especially regarding potential costs or negative effects, the matter was remanded for reassessment.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV; Art. 70 Abs. 5 StGB. Die Möglichkeit nach Art. 70 Abs. 5 StGB, den Umfang der einzuziehenden Vermögenswerte zu schätzen, entbindet den Richter nicht von seiner Pflicht, den ermittelten Schätzbetrag rechtsgenüglich zu begründen. | Strafrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
utilisation sans droit de valeurs patrimoniales calcul de l'amende perte de gain confiscation pénale durée de l'infraction tentative de soustraction fiscale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for finding a violation of the right to be heard due to insufficient justification of the estimated confiscation amount.
Art. 70 Abs. 5 StGB
Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis concerning the estimation of confiscated assets, which was deemed insufficiently reasoned.
Art. 59 Ziff. 4 aStGB

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 129 I 232
Federal Supreme Court Upholds Invalidation of Secret Ballot for Naturalization
Généré par l'IA
KA 00 72
Appeal Regarding Seizure of Insurance Proceeds in Financial Crime Investigation
KA 00 127
Appeal Regarding Mutual Legal Assistance for Lottery-Like Scheme Investigation
7H 21 29
Social Assistance Repayment and Vehicle Confiscation Appeal
1C 12 15
Appellate Court Overturns Order for Security Based on Commercial Law Provision

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV

Cited in the dispositive as the basis for finding a violation of the right to be heard due to insufficient justification of the estimated confiscation amount.

Art. 70 Abs. 5 StGB

Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis concerning the estimation of confiscated assets, which was deemed insufficiently reasoned.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 16.05.2007

Fallnummer: · 21 07 36

LGVE: · 2007 I Nr. 43

Leitsatz: · Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV; Art. 70 Abs. 5 StGB. Die Möglichkeit nach Art. 70 Abs. 5 StGB, den Umfang der einzuziehenden Vermögenswerte zu schätzen, entbindet den Richter nicht von seiner Pflicht, den ermittelten Schätzbetrag rechtsgenüglich zu begründen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.