Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
11 09 55 • KG LU 11 09 55 Généré par l'IA

Driver Compensation for Excess Overtime Distinction (OR/ArG)

Numéro de cause 11 09 55
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed a dispute over compensation for additional work performed by a driver after the employment relationship ended, clarifying the legal distinction between overtime ("Überstunden") and excess overtime ("Überzeit") under the Code of Obligations (OR) and the Working Hours Act (ArG). The court reasoned that for drivers, the statutory weekly maximum working time is 46 hours, as defined by specific regulation for professional drivers; work performed beyond this limit constitutes "Überzeit," which, under mandatory law, must be compensated with base pay plus a surcharge or compensated with equivalent time off, regardless of any contractual agreement seeking to waive this compensation, which was only validly waived for hours worked up to the 46-hour limit ("Überstunden").

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 321c OR, Art. 13 ArG, Art. 321c Abs. 3 OR, Art. 13 Abs. 2 ArG, Art. 13 Abs. 1 ArG, Art. 9 ArG; Driver Compensation for Excess Overtime Distinction (OR/ArG): The court reasoned that for drivers, the statutory weekly maximum working time is 46 hours, as defined by specific regulation for professional drivers; work performed beyond this limit constitutes "Überzeit," which, under mandatory law, must be compensated with base pay plus a surcharge or compensated with equivalent time off, regardless of any contractual agreement seeking to waive this compensation, which was only validly waived for hours worked up to the 46-hour limit ("Überstunden").

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
indemnisation des heures supplémentaires durée légale du travail obligations contractuelles rapports de travail limites légales maintien du paiement du salaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 321c OR
Cited in the substantive reasoning regarding the remuneration of overtime (Überstunden).
Art. 13 ArG
Cited as the mandatory provision governing the compensation for work performed beyond the maximum weekly working hours (Überzeit).
Art. 321c Abs. 3 OR
17 Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art.
Art. 13 Abs. 2 ArG
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 16.03.2010 Fallnummer: · 11 09 55 LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 17 Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art. 13 ArG. Unterscheidung zwischen Überstundenund Überzeitarbeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.
Art. 13 Abs. 1 ArG
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 16.03.2010 Fallnummer: · 11 09 55 LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 17 Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art. 13 ArG. Unterscheidung zwischen Überstundenund Überzeitarbeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.
Art. 9 ArG
Art. 56 SVG
Art. 6 Abs. 1 dieser

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
4C.142/2005
Executive Secretary's Claim for Unproven Overtime Denied.
BGE 126 III 337
Employee Overtime Compensation and Mandatory Labor Law Protections
Généré par l'IA
S 92 422
Appeal Timeliness and Employee Status of Auxiliary Taxi Driver
11 98 99
Employee v. Employer: Unpaid Overtime Compensation and Evidentiary Predicament
1B 11 63
Overtime Compensation During Immediate Termination Release
11 05 37
Wage Claim Confirmation Despite Employer Overpayment Offset Denial and Contributory Fault Irrelevance

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 321c OR

Cited in the substantive reasoning regarding the remuneration of overtime (Überstunden).

Art. 13 ArG

Cited as the mandatory provision governing the compensation for work performed beyond the maximum weekly working hours (Überzeit).

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 16.03.2010 Fallnummer: · 11 09 55 LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 17 Leitsatz: · Art. 321c OR; Art. 13 ArG. Unterscheidung zwischen Überstundenund Überzeitarbeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.