Legislator Case Law & Legislation
SK 05 24 • KG LU SK 05 24 AI generated

Tax Enforcement Authorization Despite Pending Liability Limitation Request

Case Number SK 05 24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court granted definitive authorization for debt collection based on a final tax assessment despite the debtor's pending request to the tax office for a liability ruling that would limit their responsibility for the joint tax debt as a married person. The court reasoned that a request for a proportionate liability limitation under tax law can only suspend or prevent enforcement proceedings, including the authorization for debt collection, if it was filed *before* the creditor initiated the debt enforcement procedure; since the debtor filed this request only after the creditor applied for authorization of debt collection and served the response to that application, the request was deemed untimely and irrelevant to the enforcement court, which must grant authorization if the final assessment title requirements are otherwise met.

Legislator headnote

Official

Art. 80 Abs. 2 SchKG; § 20 StG (resp. § 17 aStG). Definitive Rechtsöffnung trotz hängigem Gesuch um anteilsmässige Beschränkung der Haftung für Steuerschuld. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Keywords

AI generated
request for debt enforcement enforcement of tax assessment tax debt tax procedure pending proceedings limited liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 80 Abs. 2 SchKG

The definitive legal opening was granted based on this provision, as the debtor failed to produce a timely liability ruling.

§ 20 StG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 80 Abs. 2 SchKG regarding the substantive requirement for liability determination, although the request was deemed late.

§ 17 aStG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 80 Abs. 2 SchKG regarding the substantive requirement for liability determination, although the request was deemed late.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 08.04.2005

Fallnummer: · SK 05 24

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 48

Leitsatz: · Art. 80 Abs. 2 SchKG; § 20 StG (resp. § 17 aStG). Definitive Rechtsöffnung trotz hängigem Gesuch um anteilsmässige Beschränkung der Haftung für Steuerschuld.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.