Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
1B 11 35 • KG LU 1B 11 35 AI generated

Venue for Enforcement Annulment Following Declaratory Judgment with Prorogated Forum

Case Number 1B 11 35
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Switzerland · Canton of Lucerne (CH-LU)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Entscheidsuche mirror Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court addressed a dispute where a party sought the annulment of an enforcement action connected to a negative declaratory judgment regarding professional fees. The court held that an application to set aside an enforcement action can be combined with a negative declaratory judgment action, and if the venue for the declaratory action was contractually agreed upon (prorogated), that same venue is competent for the enforcement annulment, notwithstanding mandatory enforcement venue rules. Furthermore, a forum selection clause contained within a mandate agreement, prepared by one party but signed only by the other, was deemed validly agreed upon under the applicable formal requirements, and challenging its validity on formal grounds was considered an abuse of rights, given that the party challenging it had actively relied on and benefited from the underlying mandate agreement.

Legislator headnote

Official

§ 93 ZPO LU (neu Art. 88 ZPO); Art. 22 Abs. 1 und 85a SchKG; Art. 9 aGestG (neu Art. 17 ZPO). Der Antrag auf Aufhebung einer Betreibung kann mit der negativen Feststellungsklage verbunden werden. Wurde der Gerichtsstand für die Feststellungsklage prorogiert, ist das prorogierte Gericht auch für die Aufhebung der Betreibung zuständig. Eine in einer Anwaltsvollmacht enthaltene Gerichtsstandsklausel ist gültig, auch wenn die Vollmacht nur von der Vollmachtgeberin unterzeichnet wurde. | Zivilprozessrecht

Keywords

AI generated
action for annulment action for a declaratory judgment enforcement decision grounds of jurisdiction rules of procedure framework decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 88 ZPO
Leitsatz: · § 93 ZPO LU (neu Art. 88 ZPO); Art.
Art. 9 aGestG
1 und 85a SchKG; Art. 9 aGestG (neu Art.
Art. 17 ZPO
9 aGestG (neu Art. 17 ZPO).
Art. 22 Abs. 1 SchKG
This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, relating to the substance of the debt enforcement matter being addressed.
Art. 22 SchKG
Art. 85a SchKG
This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, relating to the substantive issue of connecting the debt cancellation request with the declaratory action.
Art. 9 Abs. 1 ZPO
1 und 85a SchKG; Art. 9 aGestG (neu Art.
Art. 8a Abs. 3 lit. a SchKG

Cited Case Law

AI generated
BGE 120 II 20
Representative v. Creditor: Negative Declaratory Action Regarding Improper Debt Enforcement
BGE 125 III 149
Article 85a DEBA Declaratory Action Admissibility After Formal Objection
BGE 128 III 334
Debtor's Remedy Against Unpursued Debt Collection Opposition
AI generated
11 03 69
Summary Procedure vs. Enforcement Under Lugano Convention Regarding Choice of Forum Clauses
11 97 106 260
Forum Selection Clause Validity in Architectural Contracts: Jurisdiction vs. Merits
OG 1996 33
Enforcement Proceedings Substantiation Requirements
3C 15 4
Jurisdictional Challenge and Procedural Violation in Provisional Measures During Foreign Divorce Proceedings

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
§ 93 ZPO LU (neu Art. 88 ZPO)

This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, indicating its relevance to the overall decision framework regarding procedure or jurisdiction.

Art. 22 Abs. 1 SchKG

This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, relating to the substance of the debt enforcement matter being addressed.

Art. 85a SchKG

This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, relating to the substantive issue of connecting the debt cancellation request with the declaratory action.

Art. 9 aGestG (neu Art. 17 ZPO)

This provision is cited in the introductory summary/ruling section, pertaining to the validity of the forum selection clause.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · 1. Abteilung

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 30.01.2012

Fallnummer: · 1B 11 35

LGVE: · 2012 I Nr. 49

Leitsatz: · § 93 ZPO LU (neu Art. 88 ZPO); Art. 22 Abs. 1 und 85a SchKG; Art. 9 aGestG (neu Art. 17 ZPO). Der Antrag auf Aufhebung einer Betreibung kann mit der negativen Feststellungsklage verbunden werden. Wurde der Gerichtsstand für die Feststellungsklage prorogiert, ist das prorogierte Gericht auch für die Aufhebung der Betreibung zuständig. Eine in einer Anwaltsvollmacht enthaltene Gerichtsstandsklausel ist gültig, auch wenn die Vollmacht nur von der Vollmachtgeberin unterzeichnet wurde.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.

Das Bundesgericht hat die dagegen erhobene Beschwerde in Zivilsachen am 25. April 2012 abgewiesen [4A_140/2012].