Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2025 2 • VG SZ I 2025 2 KI-strukturiert

I 2025 2 — Occupational Accident Insurance Benefits Denial Affirmation

Geschäftsnummer I 2025 2 (SZ_VG_003_I-2025-2_2025-04-10)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Entscheidsuche-Spiegel ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

The appellant challenged a decision regarding a claim for occupational accident insurance benefits, stemming from an injury sustained during work. The court reasoned that for an injury to qualify as an occupational accident, the activity causing the harm must be directly connected to the execution of the employment contract, and the specific risk involved must be characteristic of the employment; here, the court upheld the lower instance's finding that the specific activity leading to the injury did not sufficiently meet the criteria of being a characteristic occupational risk, thus affirming the denial of benefits.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
The appellant challenged a decision regarding a claim for occupational accident insurance benefits, stemming from an injury sustained during work. The court reasoned that for an injury to qualify as an occupational accident, the activity causing the harm must be directly connected to the execution of the employment contract, and the specific risk involved must be characteristic of the employment; here, the court upheld the lower instance's finding that the specific activity leading to the injury did not sufficiently meet the criteria of being a characteristic occupational risk, thus affirming the denial of benefits.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2025 2

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2025 2 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 10. April 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, \n 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n