Legislator Rechtsdatenbank & Rechtsprechung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
I 2023 91 • VG SZ I 2023 91 KI-strukturiert

I 2023 91 — Industrial Accident Suit Dismissed Due to Appellant's Improper Action

Geschäftsnummer I 2023 91 (SZ_VG_003_I-2023-91_2024-08-22)
Gericht / Behörde
Entscheiddatum
Rechtsordnung Kanton Schwyz — Kantonale Gerichte (CH-SZ)
Originalquelle öffnen ↗ Entscheidsuche-Spiegel ↗ Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Zusammenfassung (Sachverhalt & Erwägungen)

KI-strukturiert

An appellant, who was injured in an industrial accident involving a machine used in their work, appealed a decision that dismissed their claim for damages and pain and suffering against the machine's owner/operator, arguing that the owner failed to ensure the machine was safe. The court upheld the prior decision, reasoning that the evidence did not establish that the machine was defective or that the owner had breached any duty of care regarding maintenance or operation, as the accident's cause was determined to be the appellant's own improper actions while using the equipment.

Leitsatz / Regeste

KI-strukturiert
An appellant, who was injured in an industrial accident involving a machine used in their work, appealed a decision that dismissed their claim for damages and pain and suffering against the machine's owner/operator, arguing that the owner failed to ensure the machine was safe. The court upheld the prior decision, reasoning that the evidence did not establish that the machine was defective or that the owner had breached any duty of care regarding maintenance or operation, as the accident's cause was determined to be the appellant's own improper actions while using the equipment.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext des Entscheids — I 2023 91

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 91 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 22. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Kläger, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG \n Beklagte, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin D.________ |\n \n\n

\n