III UK 116/10 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses pension appeal, ruling prior final judgment bars re-examining same facts on disability pension.

Geschäftsnummer III UK 116/10

Gericht / Behörde Sąd Najwyższy

Rechtsordnung

Polen (PL)

Entscheiddatum 2011-04-05

Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a final judgment denying a family pension to the deceased father's son. The lower courts had previously ruled that the father lacked the required 25 years of insurance due to missing agricultural work periods, which the appellant argued should be included under specific pension laws. The court held that because the same parties and issues were already finally decided in the earlier dispute regarding the father's pension rights, those facts could not be re-examined in this separate proceeding. Consequently, the appeal was rejected as the legal question had already been conclusively resolved by a binding judicial decision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 237 § 1 k.p.c.: A final judgment binding the parties precludes re-examination of the same legal and factual issues in subsequent proceedings between identical parties.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

res judicata principle final binding judgment family pension rights agricultural work periods disability pension eligibility social insurance law cassation appeal dismissal

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 237 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 10 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych

art. 391 § 1 k.p.c

art. 366 k.p.c

art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c

art. 365 § 1 k.p.c

art. 366 § 1 k.p.c

art. 39814 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert

Supreme Court denied pension rights because farm work before social insurance did not count for disability pension. The court ruled that only paid insurance periods qualify for disability benefits. This decision clarifies the distinction between pension and disability pension eligibility rules. The applicant failed to meet the 25-year requirement without the excluded farm work periods.

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal regarding pension denial based on prior final judgment. The court rules that a final judgment on work incapacity binds the court regarding the period up to the verdict. The court held that the principle of res judicata prevents re-evaluating the same facts without statutory grounds for retrial.

Final war invalidity ruling does not bar new pension claims if medical conditions have changed since the original decision.

Supreme Court allows pension claim review when new medical evidence changes factual basis despite prior final judgment.

Social security court dismisses appeal for citing entire law instead of specific article.

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; prior judgment on land registry entry binds liability but not debt existence.

Cassation appeal dismissed; Supreme Court held previous judgment binds parties regarding indefinite-term employment status.

Volltext