II UK 61/05
KI-generiert
Supreme Court allows pension claim review when new medical evidence changes factual basis despite prior final judgment.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's dismissal of a pension claim based on the principle of res judicata. The lower court incorrectly applied this principle to a new application filed years later with fresh medical evidence proving a link between the applicant's disability and military service. The court ruled that since the right to a pension is not time-limited, the factual basis changed, allowing the case to be re-examined on its merits.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 366 k.p.c.; Art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The principle of res judicata applies only when the factual basis of a social insurance court's decision cannot be changed; if new facts or evidence alter the factual basis, the case may be re-examined.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
res judicata principle
social insurance pension
military service disability
new medical evidence
factual basis change
time-limited right
appellate review
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertart. 366 k.p.c.
art. 386 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
art. 7 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy z dnia 2 września 1994 r. o świadczeniu pieniężnym i uprawnieniach przysługujących żołnierzom zastępczej służby wojskowej
art. 83 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 366 k.p.c
art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 3 k.p.c
art. 39313 k.p.c
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertII UK 139/02, OSNP 2004 nr 7, poz. 128
II UK 139/02
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when new evidence is not presented to reopen a final pension denial decision.