II PK 74/07
KI-generiert
Employee-manager liability for unauthorized benefits falls under Labor Code, not unjust enrichment law.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding an employee-manager's liability for self-granted benefits. The lower courts had applied unjust enrichment principles, but the appellant argued for labor code liability. The court ruled that when an employee-manager takes unauthorized benefits, the Labor Code's provisions on material liability for breach of duty take precedence over unjust enrichment rules.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 31 § 1 k.p.; Art. 114 k.p.; When an employee-manager takes unauthorized benefits, liability is governed by the Labor Code's material liability provisions, excluding unjust enrichment claims.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
employee manager liability
unauthorized benefits
labor code provisions
unjust enrichment exclusion
material liability breach
dual legal status
cassation appeal dismissal
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 31 § 1 k.p.
Art. 114 k.p.
Art. 122 k.p.
Art. 405 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 31 § 1 k.p
art. 300 k.p
art. 410 k.c
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertIV PR 223/80
V PZP 2/76
I PKN 78/99
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; unjust enrichment rules cannot bypass limited employee liability if fault exists.
I PKN 557/97
Employee liable for employer damage under tort law, not contract law, for unauthorized advance deduction.
I PKN 506/99
Statutory interest does not accrue for employee delay in returning employer property unless damages are awarded.
III CZP 46/95