II BP 8/06
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming new collective agreement unilaterally reduced seniority bonus rights.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by employees against a final judgment regarding a seniority bonus dispute. The lower courts found that the employer notified workers of a new collective agreement and consistently referenced it in pay documents, while the employees remained silent for years. The court ruled that this conduct constituted a mutual agreement to accept the new, lower bonus rules, thereby preventing the employees from claiming a unilateral reduction of their rights.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 4244 k.p.c.; Art. 102 k.p.c.; A unilateral change in remuneration conditions does not constitute a legal violation if the employee's silence and acceptance of the new terms through conduct demonstrate a mutual agreement to the modification.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
collective agreement
seniority bonus
unilateral change
mutual agreement
remuneration reduction
labor law
employee consent
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 4244 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
art. 4244 k.p.c
art. 2418 k.p
art. 24113 § 2 k.p
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 60 k.c
art. 42 k.p
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertI PKN 62/96
Supreme Court allows seniority pay despite employer stopping payment, ruling silence does not imply agreement to change contract terms.
I PKN 349/97
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; 14-day employment start rule applies from paid leave end, not extended leave.
I PKN 29/98
Labor dispute where a collective agreement change was dismissed as it lacked statutory termination procedures.
I PKN 496/97
Employee's failure to object to salary change via board resolution implies implied consent and contract modification.