Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I PKN 62/96 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows seniority pay despite employer stopping payment, ruling silence does not imply agreement to change contract terms.

Geschäftsnummer I PKN 62/96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Poland overturned the appellate court's decision to dismiss the plaintiff's claim for seniority pay. The plaintiff argued that the employer's cessation of payments without explicit agreement constituted a breach of the employment contract, while the employer contended that the employee's silence implied acceptance of the new pay structure. The court ruled that silence cannot constitute a tacit agreement to alter contract terms, thereby allowing the plaintiff to recover the withheld seniority pay.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 393 15 k.p.c.: The cessation of payment of a specific salary component by the employer, without the employee's active objection, does not constitute a tacit agreement to modify the employment contract, and the employee is entitled to the original terms.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
seniority pay entitlement tacit agreement formation employee silence interpretation employment contract modification labor law dispute appellate review standard salary component recovery

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 393 15 k.p.c.
Art. 393 18 k.p.c.
Art. 98 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 391 k.p.c.
§ 18 ust. 1 i 3 w związku z § 17 ust. 1 pkt 2 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 4 czerwca 1992 r.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext