Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II PK 117/04 KI-generiert

Union official dismissed from work for severe breach of duty; reinstatement denied but damages awarded.

Geschäftsnummer II PK 117/04
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the union official's appeal to reinstate him after his employer terminated his contract without notice. The court found that his failure to perform basic duties and ignore safety documentation orders constituted a particularly serious breach of employment obligations. Consequently, while the request for reinstatement was rejected, the employee retained the right to claim damages for the procedural violation of his union protection status.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 25 ust. 2 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 56 k.p.; Art. 8 k.p.: A union official's particularly serious breach of duty justifies dismissal and denial of reinstatement, but does not preclude a claim for damages as an alternative remedy for procedural violations.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
union official dismissal serious breach of duty reinstatement denied damages alternative procedural violation union protection status termination without notice

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 25 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 56 k.p.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 393 § 15 k.p.c.
art. 8 k.p
art. 52 § 2 k.p
art. 30 § 4 k.p
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 56 § 1 k.p

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
I PKN 571/97
Supreme Court dismisses reinstatement claim for selling private drugs during work, allowing damages instead.
I PKN 23/00
Supreme Court dismissed union leader's appeal for reinstatement due to severe breach of duty and intoxication. Union protections do not shield from justified sanctions. Court rejected claim of procedural errors regarding evidence. Union leader cannot use special protections against valid termination. Court upheld employer's right to sanction for intoxication. Union leader failed to prove sobriety after delay. Special protections apply only to those without severe breaches.
I PKN 148/01
I PZP 40/93
I PRN 103/95
Special union protection does not bar labor court from ex officio choosing alternative claims if primary claim is unreasonable.
I PKN 63/97
Supreme Court dismisses reinstatement claim when workplace conflict makes return unreasonable, allowing damages instead.
I PKN 215/98
Polish Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling employee's post-work drinking did not constitute gross misconduct warranting dismissal.
I PKN 527/99
I PKN 552/99

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext