I PRN 103/95
KI-generiert
Special union protection does not bar labor court from ex officio choosing alternative claims if primary claim is unreasonable.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary revision against a labor court's decision to award damages instead of reinstatement. The plaintiff, a union official, argued for reinstatement after being fired for drinking alcohol at work, while the employer contended this violated social norms. The court ruled that special legal protection for union officials does not prevent the labor court from selecting an alternative claim when the requested reinstatement is unjustified.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 477 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 56 k.p.; Special legal protection for union officials does not exclude the labor court's power to ex officio select an alternative claim if the primary claim is unreasonable and contradicts social coexistence principles.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
labor law
union official
reinstatement
alternative claim
social norms
extraordinary revision
ex officio selection
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 477 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 56 k.p.
Art. 57 § 2 k.p.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 94 pkt 9 k.p.
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych
Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 481 k.c.
art. 477 § 2 k.p.c