175.2
VRGLPALGA
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 81 : Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA)
Art. 81
50 Il Tribunale amministrativo giudica in sede di ricorso quale unica istanza
a. le controversie di diritto pubblico, qualora su di esse non possa decidere né un interessato né un altro organo statale mediante decisione,
b. le controversie derivanti da contratti di diritto amministrativo, ad eccezione delle controversie derivanti da rapporti di lavoro costituiti con contratto di diritto pubblico,
c. le controversie di diritto pubblico, qualora un'altra legge preveda la loro valutazione in prima istanza da parte di un tribunale.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (29)
VB.2005.00015 · zh (§ 81 VRG)
Legitimate Expectation Claim for Planning Costs Remanded to District Council
This provision likely relates to the general jurisdiction or admissibility aspects of the administrative court's review.
VB.2002.00197 · zh (§ 81 lit. a VRG)
Jurisdiction Over Educational Cost Appeals: Student vs. School Municipality
This provision, along with others, forms the basis for the finding regarding the competent administrative body (Bezirksschulpflege).
VK.2001.00005 · zh (§ 81 lit. a VRG)
School District Not Liable for Post-Compulsory Education Accommodation Costs
Cited as a procedural basis for the court's jurisdiction and decision-making in administrative law matters.
VB.2002.00197 · zh (§ 81 lit. a VRG)
School Cost Dispute Jurisdiction: Student vs. School Municipality
This provision is implicitly used as part of the jurisdictional basis regarding the path for financial claims (Klage vor Verwaltungsgericht).
VB.2023.00335 · zh (§ 81 VRG)
Municipality Servitude Removal Standing Appeal Dismissal
Cited in relation to the lack of a protected interest for the appeal (E. 3.3).
VB.2023.00335 · zh (§ 81 lit. b VRG)
Municipality Servitude Removal Standing Appeal Dismissal
Cited in relation to the lack of a protected interest for the appeal (E. 3.3).
VB.2022.00286 · zh (§ 81 lit. b VRG)
Prison Doctor Contract Dissolution Appeal Admissibility Ruling
This provision was cited as the basis for the court's conclusion regarding the inadmissibility of the appeal, as the lower court correctly refused to enter into proceedings based on this rule.
VB.2022.00323 · zh (§ 81 VRG)
Electricity Bill Appeal Dismissed: Court Clarifies Appeal Processes and Jurisdictional Limits
Cited in the dispositive for the rejection of the complaint where applicable.
VK.2020.00001 · zh (Art. 81 VRG)
Parking Space Rental Dispute: Private vs. Administrative Law Jurisdiction
The court declined to rule on the matter because the legal relationship was qualified as private law, leading to a non-entry decision.
VK.2017.00001 · zh (§ 81 lit. b VRG)
Enforcement of Settlement Agreement for Connection Fees
This provision was cited as the legal basis for the plaintiff's request for enforcement.
VK.2016.00001 · zh (§ 81 lit. b VRG)
Subsidy Payment Dispute Not Subject to Appeal Due to Retained Administrative Authority
The court declared that it lacked jurisdiction to rule on the request for provisional measures because the main proceedings were inadmissible as a legal action.
VK.2014.00008 · zh (§ 81 lit. a VRG)
Jurisdiction Lacking for Fine Appeal
This provision establishes the administrative court's jurisdiction in disputes arising from public law in a lawsuit, when no other state organ can decide on it via a decree.
VK.2014.00004 · zh (§ 81 lit. a VRG)
Jurisdiction over Administrative Objection to Summary Execution of Public Law Hospital Fees
The court determined it was not functionally competent to rule on the dispute based on this provision.
VK.2013.00003 · zh (§ 81 lit. a VRG)
Municipality v. Administrative Court on Competence for Debt Enforcement Costs
The court did not enter judgment because the administrative court is not functionally competent to rule on the dispute according to this provision.
VK.2010.00001 · zh (§ 81 lit. b VRG)
Administrative Contract for Barn Restoration and State Obligation
This provision likely pertains to the scope of review or the procedural basis for the administrative court's jurisdiction over the administrative contract claim.