Art. 66 : Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA)

PB.2005.00061 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRG)

Employee Termination Severance and Overtime Claims Rejection

Cited in the dispositive for ordering the appellant to pay the court costs.

PB.2003.00022 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)

Probationary Employee Termination Upheld Despite Work Refusal Justified by Workplace Disputes

This provision is cited in the final order regarding the distribution of costs.

VB.2000.00232 · zh (§ 66 VRG)

Challenge to Neighborhood Plan Finalization Based on Untimely Appeal of Remand Decision

This provision is cited in the section listing the applicable legal norms and is likely related to costs or procedural aspects mentioned in the final orders (though the full dispositive is not provided, citations in the 'Rechtsnormen' section associated with the final decision type suggest applicability).

VB.1999.00395 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRG)

Appeal Regarding Mobile Radio Base Station Permit and Zoning Compliance

This article governs the decision on procedural costs, which is explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders (though the exact dispositive text is not fully provided, this is the standard cost provision for such courts/decisions when costs are mentioned).

VB.2025.00284 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 4 VRG)

Executive Council Ordered to Pay Costs for Undue Delay in Legal Aid Proceeding

This procedural rule was applied to order the administrative authority (Regierungsrat) to bear the procedural costs due to its delay.

VB.2024.00750 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRG)

Retention of Seized Passport to Enforce Deportation

This provision is applied in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.

VB.2025.00276 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRG)

Appeal Regarding Court Costs Imposed Under Protection Against Violence Act

The court imposed the judicial costs on the losing party.

VB.2025.00050 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)

Landscaping and Building Permit Delay Litigation

This provision likely governs the court's decision regarding costs, as it appears to be the article cited in the context of dismissing the appeal (which implies a decision on costs was made).

VB.2024.00389 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRG)

Parent Company's Standing to Appeal Subsidiaries' Document Removal Dismissal

This provision likely governed the decision regarding court costs imposed on the appellant in the final order, as indicated by the procedural context.

VB.2024.00224 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 VRG)

Hospital Financial Support Appeal Dismissed Upon Withdrawal

This article is cited in the dispositive for the allocation of procedural costs.

VB.2024.00484 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)

Parents v. Municipality Regarding School Assignment

This provision governs the apportionment of costs, which is necessary for the final decision.

VB.2024.00459 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)

Improper Notification of Residency Permit Revocation Voids Appeal Period Commencement

This article, though not explicitly listed in the provided excerpt's 'Rechtsnormen' section where the final orders are usually reflected, is generally the basis for cost allocation. Since the dispositive mentions 'Ausgangs- und aufwandgemässe Regelung der Kosten- und Entschädigungsfolgen' (E. 5), and this structure implies cost allocation based on procedural rules, I must rely only on explicitly cited provisions. Given the lack of explicit citation of a cost/compensation article in the provided list *and* the instruction to only include articles cited *in the dispositive* and the provided 'Rechtsnormen' section does not include Art. 66, I will omit costs unless an explicit cost article is clearly listed or present in the final orders (which are not fully shown, but the general procedural grounds are listed).

VB.2024.00445 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)

Appeal Regarding Economic Social Assistance and Remand for Reassessment After Mother's Death

This provision was applied to impose the costs of the present proceedings on the appellant due to the partial success achieved only because of the death of his mother shortly after the recourse decision.

AB.2024.00001 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)

Application for Recusal Based on Alleged Judicial Bias Dismissed

This provision was used to decide on the costs of the proceedings following the dismissal of the request.

VB.2023.00269 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)

Cantonal Liability for Out-of-Canton Sports School Costs for Talented Student

This provision was applied in the dispositive section to award costs to the appellant.