Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
175.2 VRGLPALGA CH-ZH

Art. 5a : Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (VRG)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (126 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 5a

33 1 Le persone che devono emanare un’ordinanza, collaborarvi

o prepararla, si ricusano se, nella fattispecie, appaiono personalmente

parziali, in particolare

a. hanno un interesse personale nella fattispecie;

b. sono con una parte congiunti in linea retta o in linea collaterale

fino al terzo grado, affini, coniugati, fidanzati, partner registrati,

legati da una comunione di vita di fatto o da un’adozione;

c. sono rappresentanti di una parte o sono stati attivi per una

parte nella medesima fattispecie.

2 Se la ricusazione è contestata, decide l’autorità di vigilanza

o, se si tratta della ricusazione di un membro di un’autorità collegiale,

quest’ultima senza la partecipazione del membro interessato.

← Art. 5 Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) Art. 6 →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (187)

VB.2006.00096 · zh (§ 5a Abs. 1 VRG)
Resident Appeal Against Road Project Approval Dismissed Due to Lack of Standing
The court implicitly relies on this provision when discussing the procedural aspects of the appeal to the administrative court.
VB.2004.00304 · zh (§ 5a VRG)
Museum Door Contract Award Based on Technical Merit Despite Preparatory Involvement
This provision was applied in the final order, likely concerning the procedure or the admissibility of the appeal, given its placement among the cited norms.
VB.2003.00024 · zh (§ 5a lit. I a VRG)
Tender Award Challenge Based on Post-Submission Bid Modification
This article is cited in the context of the legal framework applied to the case.
VB.2002.00263 · zh (§ 5a VRG)
Procurement Challenge Annulled Due to Appearance of Bias in Traffic Control Center Contract Award
This provision appears under 'Rechtsnormen' but its direct application in the final orders cannot be verified without the explicit dispositive section.
VB.2000.00068 · zh (§ 5a VRG)
Architectural Contract Award and Bidder Disqualification in Public Procurement
The court applied this provision regarding the mandatory grounds for recusal (Ausstandsregeln) in the context of public procurement.
BRKE.II.Nr.0280.199 · zh (§ 5a Abs. 1 VRG)
Applicant's Request for Recusal of Administrative Appeals Commission Denied
Cited in the reasoning to define when members must recuse themselves, although the court ultimately found no valid request for recusal.
VB.2003.00024 · zh (§ 5a lit. I a VRG)
Tendering Exclusion Due to Bid Modification and Recusation Issues
This provision is cited concerning the recusal (Ausstand) of an executive member, which was discussed in the reasoning and relates to the procedural conduct of the case.
VB.2006.00313 · zh (§ 5a Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipal Order Compliance and Drainage Cooperative Dispute Appeal
This procedural rule is cited in relation to the overall decision process.
VB.2024.00407 · zh (§ 5a Abs. I VRG)
Procurement Appeal: Recusal Violation in Emergency Software Award
The court considered the general rules on recusal which are largely identical to Art. 13 para. I IVöB, relevant to the decision.
VB.2025.00281 · zh (§ 5a Abs. I VRG)
Applicant v. Judicial Secretary (Withdrawal Due to Alleged Bias)
This provision is cited in the 'Rechtsnormen' section, implying its relevance to the substantive decision, which is an outright dismissal (Abweisung).
VB.2025.00080 · zh (Art. 5a Abs. I VRG)
Convict's Appeals on Recusal Refusal, Public Hearing Denial, and Custody Suitability Upheld
The decision addresses the granting of free legal assistance, referencing this relevant procedural rule.
VV250003 · zh (§ 5a Abs. 2 VRG)
Protection Order Extension Case Transfer Due to Applicant's Employment Status
Used in conjunction with § 117 GOG to establish the jurisdiction of the Administrative Commission for dealing with the transfer request based on disqualification rules.
VB.2024.00571 · zh (§ 5a VRG)
Appeal of Building Permit Annulment Dismissed Due to New Grounds Raised Post-Appeal Period
This provision relates to the costs imposed in the final order concerning the court fee.
VB.2024.00551 · zh (§ 5a Abs. I VRG)
Criminal Conviction Revocation of Residence Permit and Entry Ban Upheld
This procedural rule governed the decision on the application for abstention (Ausstandsbegehren), which was rejected.
VB.2023.00719 · zh (§ 5a Abs. 1 VRG)
Theater Funding Denial Appeal Dismissed
This procedural rule was not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.