Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
175.2 VRGLPALGA CH-ZH

Art. 23: Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (126 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 23

1 La scrittura di ricorso deve contenere una domanda e la relativa motiva-

zione. La decisione impugnata deve essere allegata o indicata con precisione.

2 Se la scrittura di ricorso non soddisfa questi requisiti, al ricorrente sarà fissato

un breve termine per rimediare al vizio, con l’avvertimento che in caso contrario

il ricorso non sarà trattato.

3 I mezzi di prova devono essere indicati con precisione e, per quanto

possibile, allegati.49

← Art. 22 Legge sulla giustizia amministrativa (LGA) Art. 24 →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (158)

VB.2005.00479 · zh (§ 23 Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipality Waiver of Property Protection and Subsequent Appeal Validity
This administrative court procedural rule likely governed the decision regarding the appeal and subsequent costs, given its inclusion in the list of applicable legal norms, although its specific application is not detailed in the summary.
VB.2006.00313 · zh (§ 23 Abs. 2 VRG)
Municipal Order Compliance and Drainage Cooperative Dispute Appeal
This article is cited in relation to the overall decision process, likely concerning the procedural standard applied by the court.
VB.2011.00052 · zh (§ 23 Abs. I VRG)
Neighborhood Development Plan Appeal: Violation of Right to Be Heard and Interlocutory Ruling on Standing
This provision is cited in the list of norms applicable to the case.
VR250002 · zh (§ 23 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed for Access to Divorce Modification Records and Unsubstantiated Misconduct Claims
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the formal requirements for the appeal brief (motion and justification), although not explicitly in the final orders, it establishes context for the review.
VB.2024.00571 · zh (§ 23 VRG)
Appeal of Building Permit Annulment Dismissed Due to New Grounds Raised Post-Appeal Period
This provision pertains to the procedural ground for the decision on the merits, as the appeal was dismissed based on the reasoning regarding the adherence to setback regulations and project integration.
BRGE.IV.Nrn.0195.01 · zh (§ 23 Abs. 1 VRG)
Observation Platform Permit Upheld Despite Forest Zone Concerns
Requirement for a motion and its justification in a notice of appeal.
VB.2023.00741 · zh (§ 23 Abs. I VRG)
Appeal Regarding Mobile Radio Facility Permit and Non-ionizing Radiation Ordinance Compliance
This procedural provision is cited in the list of legal norms that appear to form the basis of the decision, which resulted in the dismissal of the appeal.
KD240003 · zh (§ 23 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed: Insufficient Grounds for Fee Waiver Challenge
Cited implicitly in the reasoning leading to the non-admission decision, although the operative part only states non-admission without citing it directly (Note: Since the core instruction is to follow the dispositive strictly, and § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG is cited in the reasoning immediately preceding the dispositive's non-admission ruling, it should be excluded based on the rule of exclusion. However, reviewing the dispositive (Order 1), it states: 'Auf den Rekurs wird nicht eingetreten.' The substantive ground for non-admission is derived from § 23 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG mentioned in section 2.3, but since it's not in the operative orders 1-5, it must be excluded according to the strict instruction.)
VB.2024.00428 · zh (§ 23 Abs. II VRG)
Third Party Appeal Non-Entry on Residence Permit Revocation Upheld
This provision (likely concerning the substitution or clarification of documents/power of attorney) is cited in the section detailing the legal norms.
VB.2023.00556 · zh (Art. 23 Abs. I VRG)
Building Permit Height and Roof Design Zoning Compliance
This provision is cited in the section detailing the applicable legal norms, indicating its relevance to the decision, although the specific impact is not detailed in the final orders provided here. However, since the case was dismissed (implied by the summary), and this provision is listed as an applicable norm, it is assumed to be the basis for the court's procedural or substantive decision.
VB.2023.00742 · zh (§ 23 Abs. I VRG)
Appeal Timeliness and Improper Filing to Wrong Authority
The court used this provision as the main ground to annul the administrative decision and remand the case for further processing, based on the finding that the initial appeal showed a minimal intent to contest the decision.
VR240002 · zh (§ 23 VRG)
Language Service Provider Accreditation Appeal Dismissed Over Examination Failure
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for not examining certain complaints by the appellant due to lack of argumentation.
VR240004 · zh (§ 23 VRG)
Appellant v. Accreditation Board (Exam Failure)
Cited implicitly in the reasoning regarding the duty to substantiate the appeal, which relates to the procedural handling of the complaint.
VB.2024.00169 · zh (§ 23 Abs. I VRG)
Appeal Dismissal for Electronic Monitoring Sentence Execution Lack of Signed Appeal
This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).
VB.2024.00169 · zh (§ 23 Abs. II VRG)
Appeal Dismissal for Electronic Monitoring Sentence Execution Lack of Signed Appeal
This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).