Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
726.1-1 IVÖBAIMPCIAP CH-VS

Art. 1 Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP) (AIMP) - Oggetto

Oggetto, Scopo e Definizioni
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (65 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 1 IVöB - Oggetto · Oggetto

1. Questo accordo si applica all'assegnazione di appalti pubblici da parte di committenti subalterni sia all'interno che all'esterno dell'ambito del trattato di Stato.

Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (CIAP) (AIMP) - Oggetto Art. 2 IVöB - Scopo →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (6)

A1 20 68 · vs (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. d IVöB)
Appeal Regarding Improper Contract Award Procedure and Bid Disclosure
Cited in the reasoning, but not in the dispositive.
A1 17 51 · vs (art. 1 al. 3 let. b AIMP)
Public Works Contract Award Cancellation Due to Material Quantity Discrepancy in Tender Documents
Cited in the reasoning as a basis for guaranteeing equal treatment, which was violated.
A1 17 51 · vs (art. 1 al. 3 let. c AIMP)
Public Works Contract Award Cancellation Due to Material Quantity Discrepancy in Tender Documents
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the transparency requirement, which was violated.
A1 16 107 · vs (Art. 1 Abs. 3 lit. c IVöB)
Administrative Contract Award Appeal Over Artificial Turf Renewal
Violation of the transparency requirement led to the annulment of the award decision.
RVJ 2016 p 25 30 · vs (art. 1 al. 3 let. c AIMP)
Procurement Evaluation Methodology and Transparency Violation
Cited in the reasoning section as the basis for the transparency requirement that mandates prior communication of sub-criteria and their weighting.
A1 13 230 · vs (Art. 1 Abs. 3 IVöB)
Municipality Contract Award Overturned Due to Severe Procedural Violations in Selective Procurement
Cited in the reasoning to support the conclusion that the violation of the transparency requirement (Art. 1 Abs. 3 IVöB) necessitated the annulment of the award.