Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
455.1 AGTSCHGLALPA CH-VS

Art. 10 Legge di applicazione della legge federale sulla protezione degli animali (LALPA) - Veterinario Cantonale

**Organi Competenti - Organi di Esecuzione**
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (61 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 10 AGTSchG - Veterinario Cantonale · Veterinario Cantonale

1. Il veterinario cantonale è responsabile dell'attuazione e dell'ordinamento delle misure di protezione degli animali previste dalla legislazione federale e cantonale.

2. Egli dirige l'ufficio veterinario cantonale.

← Art. 9 AGTSchG - Ufficio Veterinario Cantonale Legge di applicazione della legge federale sulla protezione degli animali (LALPA) - Scopo Art. 11 AGTSchG - Ufficio per la Caccia, la Pesca e la Fauna Selvatica →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (11)

SST.2024.49 · ag (Art. 28 Abs. 1 lit. a i.V.m. Art. 6 Abs. 1 TSchG sowie i.V.m. Art. 3 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2, Art. 6, Art. 7, Art. 10, Art. 36 Abs. 1 TSchV sowie i.V.m. Art. 6 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3 Nutz- und HaustierV)
Animal Welfare Violations: Sheep Left Without Adequate Shelter and Dry Resting Areas
This provision defines the offense of disregarding animal welfare regulations and was used to establish the defendant's guilt.
B.2017.172 · sg (Art. 10 Abs. 2 TSchV)
Cow Tie-Stall Dimensions Compliance Appeal Dismissed
Cited regarding the obligation to check if space can be redistributed to meet minimum requirements when maintaining stable systems.
B.2017.172 · sg (Art. 10 Abs. 3 TSchV)
Cow Tie-Stall Dimensions Compliance Appeal Dismissed
Cited regarding the cantonal authority's power to grant deviations from minimum requirements.
B.2017.172 · sg (Art. 10 TSchV)
Cow Tie-Stall Dimensions Compliance Appeal Dismissed
This article, requiring compliance with minimum requirements in Annexes 1-3, was used in the reasoning that led to the dismissal of the appeal concerning the required minimum width.
B.2017.172 · sg (Art. 10 Abs. 1 TSchV)
Cattle Keeper Ordered to Widen Insufficient Tie-Stalls
Cited regarding compliance with minimum requirements in Annexes 1-3 (General reference in reasoning, not dispositive).
B.2017.172 · sg (Art. 10 Abs. 2 TSchV)
Cattle Keeper Ordered to Widen Insufficient Tie-Stalls
Cited regarding the review obligation when maintenance measures exceed simple element replacement (General reference in reasoning, not dispositive).
B.2017.172 · sg (Art. 10 Abs. 3 TSchV)
Cattle Keeper Ordered to Widen Insufficient Tie-Stalls
Cited regarding cantonal authority to allow deviations (General reference in reasoning, not dispositive).
B.2017.172 · sg (Art. 10 TSchV)
Cattle Keeper Ordered to Widen Insufficient Tie-Stalls
Impliedly used as the basis for the requirement that accommodations must meet minimum requirements in Annex 1, which was central to the appeal's rejection.
OG O2S 14 7 · ar (Art. 28 Abs. 1 lit. a TSchG i.V.m. Art. 6 Abs. 1 TSchG i.V.m. Art. 10 Abs. 1 TSchV i.V.m. Art. 61 TSchV)
Public Prosecutor v. Acquittal on Horse Welfare Charges
This provision is the substantive legal basis for the acquittal of the defendant concerning the violation of the Animal Protection Act.
OG O2S 14 8 · ar (Art. 28 Abs. 1 lit. a TSchG i.V.m. Art. 6 Abs. 1 TSchG i.V.m. Art. 10 Abs. 1 TSchV i.V.m. Art. 61 TSchV)
Appeal of Acquittal on Animal Protection and Disease Violations
The appellant was acquitted of the charge of violating animal welfare law under these provisions in the final order.
VB.2014.00271 · zh (Art. 10 Abs. I TSchV)
Petitioner v. Construction Authority Regarding Fence Material and Landscape Impact
This provision is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' and relates to animal welfare and is relevant to the case concerning the size of the paddock.