211.1
EGZGBLACC
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 114 Legge di applicazione del Codice civile svizzero (LACC) - Gradi di ricorso
Applicazione del diritto privato federale - Casi civili giudiziari - Giurisdizione civile non contenziosa - Procedimenti speciali - Organizzazione delle autorità di protezione dei minori e degli adulti
Art. 114 EGZGB - Gradi di ricorso · Gradi di ricorso
1. L'istanza competente per i ricorsi è
a) * l'autorità di protezione per i reclami contro azioni e omissioni del curatore, del tutore o di una terza persona o ente al quale l'autorità di protezione ha conferito un incarico (Art. 419 CC);
b) un giudice specializzato nominato dal tribunale cantonale per le impugnazioni basate sull'articolo 439 CC;
c) il tribunale cantonale per i ricorsi
1. contro le decisioni di ricorso dell'autorità di protezione (Art. 114 cpv. 1 lett. a),
2. contro misure precauzionali (Art. 445 cpv. 3 CC),
3. contro le decisioni del giudice specializzato nelle impugnazioni basate sull'articolo 439 CC,
4. contro le altre decisioni dell'autorità di protezione (Art. 450 cpv. 1 CC).
2. I ricorsi al tribunale cantonale possono essere giudicati da un giudice unico.
3. Questi mezzi di ricorso sono applicabili in modo analogo per la protezione dei minori.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (43)
C1 24 211 · vs (Art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 4 et al. 2 LACC)
Appeal of Curatorship Establishment for Mentally Ill Individual
This provision defines the jurisdictional competence of the court to hear the appeal against the decision of the adult protection authority (though not strictly cited in the final orders, it underpins the admissibility check in 1.1).
C1 24 239 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 4 et al. 2 LACC)
Father Contact Suspension Overruled Due to Failure to Hear Children's Testimony
Cited as the legal basis for the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Tribunal to hear the appeal.
C1 25 99 · vs (Art. 114 Abs. 1 lit. c Ziff. 3 i. V. m. Abs. 2 EGZGB)
In re Welfare Placement Order and Denial of Legal Aid for Individual with Schizophrenia
Procedural provision cited in the reasoning section establishing the jurisdiction for appeals against ZMG decisions, which sets the stage for the review leading to the dismissal of the appeal in point 1.
C1 24 121 · vs (Art. 114 al. 2 LACC)
Mother Granted De Facto Custody; Father's Visitation Modified
Cited in reasoning regarding jurisdiction, but not in the final orders 1-4.
C1 25 36 · vs (Art. 314 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 450a Abs. 2 und Art. 450b Abs. 3 ZGB; Art. 20 Abs. 3 RPflG; Art. 114 Abs. 1 lit. c Ziff. 4 und Abs. 2 EGZGB)
Father's Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Dismissed; Jurisdiction Confirmed.
These provisions establish the right to appeal against denial or delay of action by the child protection authority, which forms the basis for reviewing the case.
C1 25 3 · vs (Art. 114 Abs. 1 und 2 EGZGB)
Appeal Regarding Replacement of Asset Management Guardian with Professional Fiduciary
Cited in the reasoning regarding the competence of the court.
C1 24 220 · vs (Art. 114 Abs. 1 lit. c Ziff. 4 Ziff. 2 und 3 EGZGB)
KESB Decision Upheld: Child Placement in Closed Facility Affirmed
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to appeal against decisions on placement.
C1 24 80 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 lettre c chiffre 3 LACC)
In re Commitment of A.B.
Cited regarding the jurisdiction of the single judge of the Cantonal Tribunal to rule on the appeal against the decision on placement for assistance.
C1 23 176 · vs (Art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 4 et al. 2 LACC)
Custody and Schooling Location Dispute Over Stability of Children's Ties
Cited regarding the competence of the single judge of the Cantonal Tribunal for appeals against child protection authority decisions.
C1 22 289 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 2 et al. 2 LACC)
Maternal Authority's Decision on Child Placement Overturned for Lack of Oral Hearing
This provision is cited to establish the jurisdiction for the appeal against the provisional decision (although the main ground of the final order is the violation of the right to be heard).
C1 22 142 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 4 LACC)
Appeal Against Representation Curatorship Based on Insufficient Medical Evaluation
Cited in the reasoning to establish the cantonal court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
C1 22 142 · vs (art. 114 al. 2 LACC)
Appeal Against Representation Curatorship Based on Insufficient Medical Evaluation
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the appeal could be decided by a single judge.
C1 21 294 · vs (Art. 114 Abs. 1 lit. c Ziff. 4 sowie Abs. 2, Art. 117 Abs. 3 EGZGB)
Father's Appeal Against Continued Out-of-Home Placement for Daughter Dismissed
Cited as part of the procedural rules establishing the admissibility and legitimacy of the appeal to the Cantonal Court.
C1 22 154 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 3 LACC)
Commitment for Assistance of Patient with Bipolar Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder Upheld
Cited as the basis for the admissibility of the appeal against the decision of the judge for coercive measures.
C1 22 98 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 4 LACC)
Biological Father's Post-Adoption Contact Request Denied Due to Prior Consent and Child's Best Interests
Cited as the basis for the Cantonal Court's jurisdiction to hear appeals against protection authority decisions.