Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.8 GTARLTAR CH-VS

Art. 36 Legge sul tariffario delle spese e ripetibili dinanzi alle autorità giudiziarie o amministrative (LTar)

**Risarcimenti - Onorario del Legale nelle Cause Penali**
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (47 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 36 GTar

1. Nel procedimento davanti all'autorità penale, l'onorario è fissato come segue

a) davanti al tribunale di polizia da 250 a 650 franchi;

b) davanti alla polizia, nel procedimento di indagine (avvocato di prima ora) da 250 a 1'600 franchi;

c) davanti al pubblico ministero come autorità di conciliazione da 60 a 1'100 franchi;

d) davanti al pubblico ministero per gli altri procedimenti da 550 a 5'500 franchi;

e) davanti al tribunale delle misure coercitive da 550 a 3'300 franchi;

f) davanti al tribunale distrettuale da 550 a 3'300 franchi;

g) davanti al tribunale circondariale da 1'100 a 8'800 franchi;

h) davanti al giudice o al tribunale minorile in prima istanza da 550 a 3'300 franchi;

i) davanti al tribunale minorile in procedimento d'appello da 550 a 5'500 franchi;

j) davanti al tribunale cantonale nei procedimenti d'appello e revisione da 1'100 a 8'800 franchi;

k) davanti a un giudice del tribunale cantonale o della camera penale nel procedimento di reclamo da 300 a 2'200 franchi;

l) davanti al giudice dell'esecuzione penale e delle misure e negli altri procedimenti penali ai sensi dello EGStGB da 300 a 2'200 franchi.

← Art. 35 GTar - Appello, Ricorso, Revisione, Chiarimenti e Correzioni Legge sul tariffario delle spese e ripetibili dinanzi alle autorità giudiziarie o amministrative (LTar) - Ambito di applicazione Art. 37 - Procedura dinanzi alle autorità amministrative →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (27)

P3 25 13 · vs (Art. 36 Abs. 1 lit. d GTar)
Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings and Compensation for Wrongful Custody
Cited in the reasoning (point 2.4) to establish the applicable hourly rate framework for calculating the party compensation awarded in dispositive order 3.
P3 25 13 · vs (Art. 36 lit. k GTar)
Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings and Compensation for Wrongful Custody
Cited in the reasoning (point 3.2) to establish the applicable fee framework for setting the party compensation awarded in dispositive order 5.
P1 24 142 · vs (Art. 36 lit. j GTar)
Riot and Assault Conviction Appeals with Counsel Fee Review
Cited for the applicable fee range for an attorney's lump-sum fee in the appeal before the Cantonal Court.
P3 24 260 · vs (Art. 36 lit. k GTar)
Prosecutor's Discontinuance of Misappropriation Case Overturned Due to Insufficient Evidence and Contradictory Statements
Cited to specify the range for setting the lawyer's fee in appeal proceedings before the appeal instance.
A3 24 13 · vs (Art. 36 GTar)
Appeal Against Jointly Imposed Fine on Grounds of Individualized Sanction Principle
Cited in the reasoning (5.4.2) to establish the range for determining the amount of party compensation for the appeal procedure.
P3 24 108 · vs (Art. 36 lit. k GTar)
Complainants' Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Investigate Several Allegations Upheld in Part
Cited in the reasoning for determining the range of the party compensation, which was confirmed in the dispositive.
P1 23 107 · vs (Art. 36 GTar)
Appeal Regarding Conviction, Sentence, and Damages in Attempted Rape and Drug Case
Used in the reasoning to determine the amount of party compensation for the defense counsel (Ruppen and Sarbach) in the appeal.
P2 22 48 · vs (Art. 36 GTar)
Pre-trial Detention Ordered Due to High Flight Risk Following Sentence Increase
Cited in the reasoning to establish the typical fee ranges for legal representation at various procedural stages.
P3 24 23 · vs (Art. 36 lit. k GTar)
Heirs v. Public Prosecutor (Death Following Fall at Public Toilet)
Cited in the reasoning to set the range for the party compensation (Parteientschädigung) in appeal proceedings.
P1 22 140 · vs (art. 36 al. 1 let. d, e et g LTar)
Prosecutor's Appeal Upheld, Sentence Increased; Defense Fee Appeal Rejected
Cited in reasoning regarding fee maxima, which is relevant to the fee fixation upheld in the final order (Art. 10).
P1 20 74 · vs (art. 36 let. j LTar)
Appeal Regarding Gross Traffic Violations, Negligent Bodily Harm, and Imprisonment for Dangerous Driving
The court set the compensation amount for the private parties for the appeal proceedings based on this tariff provision.
P3 23 98 · vs (Art. 36 lit. k GTar)
Appeal Against Seizure of Funds Related to Drug Trafficking
Applied to determine the amount of the fixed compensation for the official defense counsel.
P1 22 97 · vs (Art. 36 lit. j GTar)
Prosecutor's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing and Insufficient Reasoning
Cited in the reasoning to determine the standard fee range for lawyer's fees in criminal appeals before the Cantonal Court.
P3 22 126 · vs (Art. 36 GTar)
Defense Attorney Fee Appeal in Fraudulent Bankruptcy Case
Cited to justify exceeding the statutory upper limit for the official remuneration (Fr. 5'500.00) due to special circumstances.
P3 22 69 · vs (Art. 36 GTar)
Prosecutor's Suspension of Criminal Proceedings Overruled Due to Unreasonable Delay
Cited to determine the range for calculating the party compensation for the appeal procedure.